Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-59453-2.00060-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanadium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Today, there is disagreement regarding the carcinogenic responses to V 2 O 5 and evidence supporting that a genotoxic mode of action is still insufficient [ 5 ]. The general consensus is that while both positive and negative results have been reported, the weight of evidence suggests that V 2 O 5 has the potential to induce aneuploidy, micronucleus (MN), and chromosomal aberrations in some cells in vitro and in vivo (somatic cells) [ 3 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, there is disagreement regarding the carcinogenic responses to V 2 O 5 and evidence supporting that a genotoxic mode of action is still insufficient [ 5 ]. The general consensus is that while both positive and negative results have been reported, the weight of evidence suggests that V 2 O 5 has the potential to induce aneuploidy, micronucleus (MN), and chromosomal aberrations in some cells in vitro and in vivo (somatic cells) [ 3 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there is hardly any literature on elevated systemic vanadium levels [55,56]. Systemic effects on liver, kidneys, the central nervous system, the cardiovascular system and haematopoietic organs have been observed in animal studies [57]. Valid human data on vanadium-induced systemic effects relating to joint replacements are not available.…”
Section: Other Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…States can codify peremptory strike protections for certain classes of jurors in codes of civil and criminal procedure in the sections where jury selection and peremptory strike procedure are prescribed. 157 For example, California passed Assembly Bill 87 in 2015, 158 modifying its code of civil procedure to prohibit peremptory challenges "on the basis of an assumption that the prospective juror is biased" due to certain characteristics, including disability. 159 Sponsors of the bill noted that it was a "modest but necessary step to ensure that defendants are allowed a trial by an impartial jury that reflects a cross section of the population in a community" and to make sure that prospective jurors are not denied the opportunity to participate in the "civic duty" of jury service.…”
Section: B States Can Pass Laws or Amend Rules Of Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%