2017
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vapor–pressure deficit and extreme climatic variables limit tree growth

Abstract: Assessing the effect of global warming on forest growth requires a better understanding of species-specific responses to climate change conditions. Norway spruce and European beech are among the dominant tree species in Europe and are largely used by the timber industry. Their sensitivity to changes in climate and extreme climatic events, however, endangers their future sustainability. Identifying the key climatic factors limiting their growth and survival is therefore crucial for assessing the responses of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
67
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
7
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, both hydraulic and carbon constraints (Herms & Mattson, ; McDowell et al, ) can lead to general metabolic limitations as indicated by impaired carbon transport from sources to sinks (Ruehr et al, ) or reduced allocation to defense compounds (McDowell et al, ) and the consequences thereof might strongly determine the recovery trajectories. Our findings are in agreement with recent dendroecological studies showing a higher vulnerability of spruce and larch to drought than fir (Lévesque et al, ; van der Maaten‐Theunissen, Kahle, & Maaten, ; Vitali, Buntgen, & Bauhus, ), which is also in line with studies showing a high sensitivity of spruce to elevated VPD (Sanginés de Cárcer et al, ) and the inability of its root system to access deep water layers during summer drought (Brinkmann, Eugster, Buchmann, & Kahmen, ). Our study also confirms that sessile and pedunculate oaks are able to cope with severe hot drought, as previously suggested in a study focusing on its water status and photosynthesis during the extremely hot drought in 2003 (Leuzinger, Zotz, Asshoff, & Körner, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, both hydraulic and carbon constraints (Herms & Mattson, ; McDowell et al, ) can lead to general metabolic limitations as indicated by impaired carbon transport from sources to sinks (Ruehr et al, ) or reduced allocation to defense compounds (McDowell et al, ) and the consequences thereof might strongly determine the recovery trajectories. Our findings are in agreement with recent dendroecological studies showing a higher vulnerability of spruce and larch to drought than fir (Lévesque et al, ; van der Maaten‐Theunissen, Kahle, & Maaten, ; Vitali, Buntgen, & Bauhus, ), which is also in line with studies showing a high sensitivity of spruce to elevated VPD (Sanginés de Cárcer et al, ) and the inability of its root system to access deep water layers during summer drought (Brinkmann, Eugster, Buchmann, & Kahmen, ). Our study also confirms that sessile and pedunculate oaks are able to cope with severe hot drought, as previously suggested in a study focusing on its water status and photosynthesis during the extremely hot drought in 2003 (Leuzinger, Zotz, Asshoff, & Körner, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, there may well be differences in the ecophysiological responses of Bornean tree species to VPD compared to those of the Neotropical montane species studied in Motzer et al (), although we note that both systems are characterized by relatively aseasonal climates and that in selecting a VPD threshold of 12 hPa we adopted the upper limit identified in the above‐mentioned study. Nonetheless, to assess how sensitive our estimates are to the choice of VPD threshold, we repeated the analysis assuming a VPD max of 15 hPa as a limit to transpiration, which is in line with recent estimates for temperate tree species in Europe (Sanginés de Cárcer et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…VPD is the difference between the saturation water vapour pressure ( e s ) and the actual water vapour pressure ( e )—in other words the difference between how much moisture the air can hold before becoming saturated and the amount of moisture actually present in the air. As such, VPD is intimately linked to water transport and transpiration in plants (Anderson, ; Motzer, Munz, Kuppers, Schmitt, & Anhuf, ; Will, Wilson, Zou, & Hennessey, ), with high VPD driving reduced growth and survival in both temperate and tropical trees (McDowell et al, ; Sanginés de Cárcer et al, ). Given that RH=efalse/es×100, VPD can be expressed as )(100RHfalse/100×es, where e s is derived from T using Bolton's () equation: es=6.112×e17.67×TT+243.5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences may depend on different rooting systems or hydraulic responses to drought (e.g. differences in stomatal responses to high water deficits; Forner, Aranda, Granier, & Valladares, ; Sanginés de Cárcer et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%