2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4cp01673d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaporization of the prototypical ionic liquid BMImNTf2 under equilibrium conditions: a multitechnique study

Abstract: The vaporization behaviour and thermodynamics of the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethyl)sulfonylimide (BMImNTf2) were studied by combining the Knudsen Effusion Mass Loss (KEML) and Knudsen Effusion Mass Spectrometry (KEMS) techniques. KEML studies were carried out in a large temperature range (398-567) K by using effusion orifices with 0.3, 1, and 3 mm diameters. The vapor pressures so measured revealed no kinetically hindered vaporization effects and provided second-law vaporization … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
44
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several of these literature values are plotted with the P vap values determined here to facilitate a more thorough assessment of our data ( Figure S6A). The plot suggests that our vapor pressure results are in reasonably good agreement with the literature data, in particular with Brunetti et al [40] and Rocha et al [26]. However, the P vap value obtained by Aschenbrenner et al [29] for [C 4 mIm][Tf 2 N] at 393.15 K (1.2 Pa) is several orders of magnitude greater than our P vap under similar conditions (2.029 × 10 −3 Pa), despite using a similar TGA instrument.…”
Section: Vapor Pressure Determination For [C 4 Mim][tf 2 N]supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several of these literature values are plotted with the P vap values determined here to facilitate a more thorough assessment of our data ( Figure S6A). The plot suggests that our vapor pressure results are in reasonably good agreement with the literature data, in particular with Brunetti et al [40] and Rocha et al [26]. However, the P vap value obtained by Aschenbrenner et al [29] for [C 4 mIm][Tf 2 N] at 393.15 K (1.2 Pa) is several orders of magnitude greater than our P vap under similar conditions (2.029 × 10 −3 Pa), despite using a similar TGA instrument.…”
Section: Vapor Pressure Determination For [C 4 Mim][tf 2 N]supporting
confidence: 92%
“…As seen in (Table S3, entries 8 and 9, respectively) have been studied using a variety of techniques and reported [10,11,26,40]. Several of these literature values are plotted with the P vap values determined here to facilitate a more thorough assessment of our data ( Figure S6A).…”
Section: Vapor Pressure Determination For [C 4 Mim][tf 2 N]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graphite resistor is the heating element of a quartz tube containing the Knudsen cell. The effusion source, whose mass is monitored, was specifically modified in our laboratory29 in order to allow an optimal temperature measurement and to maximize the uniformity of the sample temperature. Briefly, both the Knudsen cell and a Pt100 platinum resistance thermometer are inserted into a capped copper cylinder; so that the temperature of the molecular source is directly measured instead of the usual “dummy” cell placed in the isothermal section of the furnace.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the KEMS technique the effusing vapors are analyzed with a mass spectrometer 32 . Details of the apparatus used here can be found in refs 33 , 34 . Briefly, it is based on a single focusing 90° magnetic sector mass spectrometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%