2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3518-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varenicline effects on drinking, craving and neural reward processing among non-treatment-seeking alcohol-dependent individuals

Abstract: Rationale The α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist varenicline has been reported to reduce drinking among both heavy-drinking smokers and primary alcoholics, and this effect may be related to varenicline-mediated reduction of alcohol craving. Among smokers, varenicline has been reported to modulate cigarette cue-elicited brain activation in several reward-related areas. Objectives This pilot study tested varenicline’s effects on drinking, alcohol craving, and alcohol cue-elicited activation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
38
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
10
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals who feel less intoxicated may decide to continue drinking or underestimate the effects of alcohol on cognitive ability and decision-making, potentially leading to increased alcohol-related consequences (e.g., driving under the influence, legal risk). However, findings from the parent study and prior established findings demonstrate that varenicline is associated with reduced alcohol consumption (McKee et al, 2009, Fucito et al, 2011, Mitchell et al, 2012, Litten et al, 2013, Verplaetse et al, in press ), reduced alcohol craving (Schacht et al, 2014), potentiated subjective aversive effects of alcohol (Childs et al, 2012), and reduced cue-elicited brain activation in the medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)(Schacht et al, 2014). Alternatively, individuals who experience less alcohol-related cognitive impairment may be less likely to make poor or risky decisions while intoxicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who feel less intoxicated may decide to continue drinking or underestimate the effects of alcohol on cognitive ability and decision-making, potentially leading to increased alcohol-related consequences (e.g., driving under the influence, legal risk). However, findings from the parent study and prior established findings demonstrate that varenicline is associated with reduced alcohol consumption (McKee et al, 2009, Fucito et al, 2011, Mitchell et al, 2012, Litten et al, 2013, Verplaetse et al, in press ), reduced alcohol craving (Schacht et al, 2014), potentiated subjective aversive effects of alcohol (Childs et al, 2012), and reduced cue-elicited brain activation in the medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)(Schacht et al, 2014). Alternatively, individuals who experience less alcohol-related cognitive impairment may be less likely to make poor or risky decisions while intoxicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, varenicline reduced alcohol craving and cue-elicited activation of the orbitofrontal cortex, with no effect on drinking behavior (Schacht et al, 2014). Varenicline dose-dependently attenuated cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol-seeking in rats (Funk et al, 2016;Wouda et al, 2011), congruent with doserelated reductions in cue-induced cocaine- (Guillem and Peoples, 2010) and nicotine-seeking (Le Foll et al, 2011, but see Wouda et al, 2011, andO'Connor et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Varenicline was never tested for effects on stress-induced reinstatement, but it inhibited cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking in Wistar rats (Wouda et al, 2011, Funk et al, 2016) and cue-induced alcohol seeking in baboons (Kaminski and Weerts, 2014). It has also reduced alcohol self-administration in animals (Steensland et al, 2007, Bito-Onon et al, 2011, Wouda et al, 2011, Hendrickson et al, 2010, Kaminski and Weerts, 2014, Sotomayor-Zárate et al, 2013), and decreased drinking and alcohol craving in human smokers and non-smokers (McKee et al, 2009, Fucito et al, 2011, Mitchell et al., 2012, Plebani et al, 2013, Schacht et al, 2014, Roberts et al, 2017, Litten et al, 2013). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%