2016
DOI: 10.3329/bjar.v40i4.26936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability, correlation and path co-efficient analysis of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.)

Abstract: Seventeen genotypes of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) were studied in a field experiment conducted at the experimental field of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, during April 2009 to September 2010. The objectives of the study were to measure the variability among the genotypes for yield and yield contributing characters, estimate genetic parameters, association among the characters and their contribution to yield. There was a great deal of significant variation for all the characters among … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fruit weight had highly significant and positive association with fruit yield per vine (0.70), fruit length (0.64) and fruit width (0.27) and fruit length had significant and positive correlation with fruit yield per vine (0.48). Similar observations were made by earlier workers Yadagiri et al, (2017) for number of fruits per vine, fruit length, Rani et al, (2015) for number of fruits per vine, average fruit weight, pulp thickness in bitter gourd, Khan et al, (2015) for fruit length, average fruit weight, number of fruits per vine in bitter gourd and Yadav and Yadav (2015) for average fruit weight only at phenotypic level, in bitter gourd. 1.00 0.14 Critical r P value = 0.30 at 1% and 0.23 at 5 % *Significant at 5% probability level, **Significant at 1% probability level Where, X 1 =Vine length (m) X 2 =Number of branches per vine X 3 =Internodal length (cm) X 4 =Node at which first male flower appear X 5 =Node at which first female flower appear X 6 =Days to first male flower X 7 =Days to first female flower X 8 =Sex ratio X 9 =Number of fruits per vine X 10 =Fruit weight (g) X 11 =Fruit length (cm) X 12 =Fruit width (mm) X 13 =Fruit yield per vine (kg) 1.00 0.14 Critical r P value = 0.30 at 1% and 0.23 at 5 % *Significant at 5% probability level, **Significant at 1% probability level Where, X 1 =Vine length (m) X 2 =Number of branches per vine X 3 =Internodal length (cm) X 4 =Node at which first male flower appear X 5 =Node at which first female flower appear X 6 =Days to first male flower X 7 =Days to first female flower X 8 =Sex ratio X 9 =Number of fruits per vine X 10 =Fruit weight (g) X 11 =Fruit length (cm) X 12 =Fruit width (mm) X 13 =Fruit yield per vine (kg) Residual effect = 0.38 Bold diagonal value indicates direct effect Critical r P value = 0.302 at 1 per cent and 0.232 at 5 per cent probability level r p = Phenotypic path coefficients with fruit yield per vine (kg)…”
Section: Phenotypic Correlationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Fruit weight had highly significant and positive association with fruit yield per vine (0.70), fruit length (0.64) and fruit width (0.27) and fruit length had significant and positive correlation with fruit yield per vine (0.48). Similar observations were made by earlier workers Yadagiri et al, (2017) for number of fruits per vine, fruit length, Rani et al, (2015) for number of fruits per vine, average fruit weight, pulp thickness in bitter gourd, Khan et al, (2015) for fruit length, average fruit weight, number of fruits per vine in bitter gourd and Yadav and Yadav (2015) for average fruit weight only at phenotypic level, in bitter gourd. 1.00 0.14 Critical r P value = 0.30 at 1% and 0.23 at 5 % *Significant at 5% probability level, **Significant at 1% probability level Where, X 1 =Vine length (m) X 2 =Number of branches per vine X 3 =Internodal length (cm) X 4 =Node at which first male flower appear X 5 =Node at which first female flower appear X 6 =Days to first male flower X 7 =Days to first female flower X 8 =Sex ratio X 9 =Number of fruits per vine X 10 =Fruit weight (g) X 11 =Fruit length (cm) X 12 =Fruit width (mm) X 13 =Fruit yield per vine (kg) 1.00 0.14 Critical r P value = 0.30 at 1% and 0.23 at 5 % *Significant at 5% probability level, **Significant at 1% probability level Where, X 1 =Vine length (m) X 2 =Number of branches per vine X 3 =Internodal length (cm) X 4 =Node at which first male flower appear X 5 =Node at which first female flower appear X 6 =Days to first male flower X 7 =Days to first female flower X 8 =Sex ratio X 9 =Number of fruits per vine X 10 =Fruit weight (g) X 11 =Fruit length (cm) X 12 =Fruit width (mm) X 13 =Fruit yield per vine (kg) Residual effect = 0.38 Bold diagonal value indicates direct effect Critical r P value = 0.302 at 1 per cent and 0.232 at 5 per cent probability level r p = Phenotypic path coefficients with fruit yield per vine (kg)…”
Section: Phenotypic Correlationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Bacteria used for the production of PHAs can be divided to two major groups based on the culture conditions required for PHA synthesis (35). First group of bacteria requires the limitation of an essential nutrient such as nitrogen, phosphorus, magnesium or sulfur for the synthesis of PHA from an excess carbon source.…”
Section: Screening Of Bacteria For Pha Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a prerequisite to standardize all the fermentation conditions, and physical and chemical parameters for the successful implementation of commercial PHA production systems (269)(270)(271)(272)(273). PHAs production costs can be reduced by several means, including the use of cheap substrates, such as whey, favored in countries with important dairy industries, or the enhancement of product yield, for example by using recombinant E. coli (7,35,267,274). Molasses, from either sugarcane or beet, is one potential cheap carbon source for PHA production.…”
Section: Economical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fruits of wild type plants are generally smaller in size, pointed at both the ends and produced small grey to black seeds while of cultivated plants have fruits of different shapes and size with length ranged up to 60 cm and produced large brown seeds (Walters and Decker-Walters 1988;Yang and Walters 1992). Significant variation was observed for earliness-related traits by Dey et al 2009 andKhan et al 2015. Diversity for ascorbic acid (60.20 mg to 122.07 mg/100 g) among bitter gourd accessions was observed by Dey et al (2005).…”
Section: Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 87%