2003
DOI: 10.1093/auk/120.4.1168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in Grassland Bird Counts Related to Observer Differences and Species Detection Rates

Abstract: Abstract Differences among observers in ability to detect and identify birds has been long recognized as a potential source of error when surveying terrestrial birds. However, few published studies address that issue in their methods or study design. We used distance sampling with line transects to investigate differences in detection probabilities among observers and among three species of grassland songbirds: Henslow's Sparrow (Ammodramus henslowii), Grasshoppe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We speculate that relatively low detectability of Grasshopper Sparrow songs were because they were both quiet and high‐frequency (see also Diefenbach et al. ); a large portion of their song (ca. 4–11 kHz; Vickery ) is above the peak human hearing sensitivity of 1–6 kHz (Davis ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We speculate that relatively low detectability of Grasshopper Sparrow songs were because they were both quiet and high‐frequency (see also Diefenbach et al. ); a large portion of their song (ca. 4–11 kHz; Vickery ) is above the peak human hearing sensitivity of 1–6 kHz (Davis ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, grasslands showed a high species richness associated with a high variance. This high variance in estimated species richness is likely owing to the usually low detection probability of grassland species (Diefenbach et al. , 2003) likely due to higher predation rates in open landscapes (Boulinier et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When approached on foot they would run away from the person and then fly long distances (>50 m) several times before being captured. When approached on the ATV, we could get within approximately 3 m without the bird moving, possibly because of the “background noise” of the ATV engine (Olinde et al , Diefenbach et al ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%