2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in microRNA recovery from plasma: Comparison of five commercial kits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is likely due to the absence of pre-analytical considerations that are important to take into account before miRNA screening, e.g. ; serum vs plasma [71], methods used for RNA isolation [72], methods for miRNA screening (microarray, Low density array, sequencing) [73], technologies for validation by qRT-PCR [74] and data normalization [75]. Particularly, the circulating levels of some miRNAs are affected by hemolysis [53,76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is likely due to the absence of pre-analytical considerations that are important to take into account before miRNA screening, e.g. ; serum vs plasma [71], methods used for RNA isolation [72], methods for miRNA screening (microarray, Low density array, sequencing) [73], technologies for validation by qRT-PCR [74] and data normalization [75]. Particularly, the circulating levels of some miRNAs are affected by hemolysis [53,76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, high-quality serum miRNA extraction is the first step that decides whether serum miRNA is effective for diagnosis, and also directly decides the accuracy of diagnosis results. There are many methods for extraction of serum miRNAs 34, 35, including commercial kits, phenol-chloroform, and Trizol extraction. Most studies state that commercial kits are very effective and outperform the phenol-chloroform method and the Trizol method in terms of simple steps, no addition of reagent or centrifugation, time-saving and labor-saving, higher efficiency and higher yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setup of this study is illustrated in Fig 1 and S1 Table. To assess the quantity and the quality of RNA that could be extracted from PBMCs, we stored aliquots containing 10 6 PBMCs for two different time periods (1 day and 83 days) in five different storage media, i.e., (1) at 4˚C in RNAlater (RNL) or at -80˚C in (2) QIAzol Lysis Reagent (QZL, Qiagen), or in the cognate lysis buffers, i.e., (3) easyMAG lysis buffer (EML) or (4) RNeasy Mini Kit lysis buffer (RLT) or (5) RiboPure RNA Purification Kit-blood, lysis buffer (RPL). In addition, three commercial RNA extraction kits were compared, i.e., NucliSENS easyMAG (EM), RNeasy Mini Kit (RE) and RiboPure RNA Purification Kit-blood (RP).…”
Section: General Set Up Of the Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High quality and quantity of extracted RNA is crucial for downstream applications such as reliable gene expression quantification through quantitative PCR [1] and RNAsequencing (RNA-seq) [2,3]. Unfortunately, proper RNA quality controls including RNA integrity are lacking in many studies [4,5,6,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%