1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00939727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in nuclear DNA content within pigeonpea,Cajanus cajan (Fabaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The similarity coefficient of accession 8081 with other accessions ranges from 0.394 to 0.467 while among other accessions it varies between 0.760 and 1.0 (Table 2). This variation is in accordance with 23.6% difference in 4C DNA amounts in 16 accessions (Ohri et al, 1994), besides morphological and phenological variations. Among the 10 species studied, the maximum (27) number of bands were present in C. goensis while C. volubilis showed minimum (13) number of bands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The similarity coefficient of accession 8081 with other accessions ranges from 0.394 to 0.467 while among other accessions it varies between 0.760 and 1.0 (Table 2). This variation is in accordance with 23.6% difference in 4C DNA amounts in 16 accessions (Ohri et al, 1994), besides morphological and phenological variations. Among the 10 species studied, the maximum (27) number of bands were present in C. goensis while C. volubilis showed minimum (13) number of bands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Cytologically, the chromosome homology expressed in successful crosses involving C. cajan with other wild species was no less than that expressed in crosses amongst the wild Cajanus species (Pundir & Singh, 1985c). The 4C DNA amounts of C. cajan and 7 other species of Cajanus are also in accordance with the crossability relationships as C. cajanifolius, C. goensis, C. lineatus and C. scarabaeoides (range 6.93-8.08 pg) have almost similar values as those of C. cajan (6.19-7.97 pg), while those of C. platycarpus (5.18 pg), C_ volubilis (4.65 pg) and C. acutifolius (11_69 pg) are highly divergent (Ohri et al, 1994;Ohri & Jha, unpubl.). Pundir and Singh (1985a) have suggested three possible pathways for the origin and evolution of cultivated pigeonpeas which might be through selection of gene mutations in C. cajanifolius, or the cultigen along with other wild species has evolved from a common gene pool, or it might be a polyphyletic origin by the selection of erect vigorous plants from an interspecific cross involving two such species as C. lineatus and C. scarabaeoides.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Studies based on morphology (van der Maesen 1980(van der Maesen , 1986(van der Maesen , 1990, cytology and crossability (Pundir and Singh 1985a, b), isozymes (Krishna and Reddy 1982) and nuclear RFLPs (Nadimpalli et al 1993) suggest a mono-phyletic origin from C. cajanifolius. On the other hand, the seed storage protein profiles (Ladizinsky and Hamel 1980;Jha and Ohri 1996) and nuclear DNA amounts (Ohri et al 1994) suggest a polyphyletic origin of the cultigen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Again in the present study, C. platycarpus is out grouped and justified its status in the tertiary gene pool [3]. However, the results of present study were at variance with crossability relationships and DNA content studies [8,14], and it might be due to the genetic divergence during the course of evolution under selection pressure. The evidences obtained from different studies till now, including the present study, unequivocally support C. cajanifolius to be the closest relative of cultivated pigeonpea [3,4,6,7,[9][10][11]13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Studies on morphology [3,4,6], cytology and crossability [7,8], isozymes [9] and nuclear RFLPs [10], suggested a monophyletic origin from C. cajanifolius. On the other hand, studies on seed protein profiling [11][12][13] and nuclear DNA amounts [14], suggested a polyphyletic origin of the C. cajan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%