2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in Outcome Reporting for Operatively Managed Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, and in line with our study, the authors found that the results shown by the scores typically used such as, Rowe, Constant, or Walch–Duplay, did not correlate with the scores which specifically evaluated shoulder performance in the sport (ASOSS and SSAS). 10 Therefore, although there is no agreement in the literature as to which score should be used to evaluate patients who underwent glenohumeral instability surgery, 17 we think it is important to evaluate athletes according to a score that reflects shoulder performance during the sports practice since general scores might not accurately reflect shoulder sport performance, thus overestimating the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, and in line with our study, the authors found that the results shown by the scores typically used such as, Rowe, Constant, or Walch–Duplay, did not correlate with the scores which specifically evaluated shoulder performance in the sport (ASOSS and SSAS). 10 Therefore, although there is no agreement in the literature as to which score should be used to evaluate patients who underwent glenohumeral instability surgery, 17 we think it is important to evaluate athletes according to a score that reflects shoulder performance during the sports practice since general scores might not accurately reflect shoulder sport performance, thus overestimating the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results highlight an issue within outcomes research in the current literature, raising concerns for a comparison of results across differing modalities and the resultant effect of pooling data for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. 23,24,29,39,42,63 Lukenchuk et al 39 reported on the extensive variability in preferred outcome measures, in which 28 different tools are currently being used for tracking the postoperative phase of anterior shoulder instability. Kasik and Saper 33 likewise reported an inconsistency in outcome measurements in the adolescent population after arthroscopic Bankart repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 Unfortunately, there is considerable variability in the reporting of patient demographics, surgical indications, surgical techniques, and patient outcomes in the available studies. 13 , 14 Furthermore, no previous investigation has directly analyzed the results of arthroscopic stabilization in the high-risk subgroup of MA athletes. Although a few studies involved patients who practiced MA, the small number of patients evaluated and the fact that they were analyzed together with the rest of the collision athletes make it difficult to obtain specific conclusions about this subgroup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%