2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-002-1366-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of drug self-administration in rats

Abstract: These results suggest that highly consistent response patterns are not simply a product of precise titration of drug levels. The weak autocorrelation between sequential latencies suggests that temporal regularity of responding is not maintained through compensatory adjustments of post-infusion pauses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
91
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
9
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…determined largely by the duration of the effect of each injection (Gerber and Wise, 1989;Panlilio et al, 2003;Tsibulsky and Norman, 1999), but drug-seeking under progressive-ratio schedules is essentially independent of duration of effect (Panlilio and Schindler, 2000; see also Ko et al, 2002). Thus, cross-tolerance to heroin's locomotorsuppressant effects would be expected to increase heroin intake under the FR1 schedule, but it should not alter the reinforcing efficacy of heroin under the progressive-ratio schedule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…determined largely by the duration of the effect of each injection (Gerber and Wise, 1989;Panlilio et al, 2003;Tsibulsky and Norman, 1999), but drug-seeking under progressive-ratio schedules is essentially independent of duration of effect (Panlilio and Schindler, 2000; see also Ko et al, 2002). Thus, cross-tolerance to heroin's locomotorsuppressant effects would be expected to increase heroin intake under the FR1 schedule, but it should not alter the reinforcing efficacy of heroin under the progressive-ratio schedule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General procedure and apparatus were described previously (Scherma et al, 2008;Panlilio et al, 2003). Self-administration sessions were 2 h long and began 7-10 days after catheterization.…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Completion of each five-response fixed ratio was treated by the computer as a virtual injection of nicotine, and the rat's virtual nicotine level was calculated continuously based on a clearance half-life of 55 min. The light was only presented when the virtual nicotine level was below 202 mg/kg, the mean level (calculated using the procedure of Panlilio et al, 2003) at which rats self-administered nicotine in a previous study (Mascia et al, 2011). To assess potential interactions between nicotine and clofibrate, half the rats were treated with nicotine (0.4 mg/kg, subcutaneous, 10 min before session) and half with saline before every food self-administration session.…”
Section: Food Self-administration In Ratsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1A shows an example of the pattern of cocaine selfadministration on a PR schedule. The first response of the session results in an intravenous cocaine infusion; thereafter the delivery of this reinforcer is contingent upon an increasing number of responses incremented through the following series: 1, 2, 4,6,9,12,15,20,25,32,40,50,62,77,95,118,145,178,219,268,328,402,492, 603, etc. [9].…”
Section: Progressive Ratio Training and Final Ratio Escalationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized, however, that the two dependent measures are very different. Final ratios reflect some measure of the motivation to obtain drug, while rate of drug intake on an FR1 schedule of reinforcement reflects the blood or brain level at which an animal will titrate its intake [46,47,48,49] but see also [50]. These are very different concepts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%