1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0899-5362(99)00101-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of magmatic sulphide compositions at the Kabanga nickel prospect, Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evolution is parallel to the mg# variation of both pyroxenes. These characteristics strongly suggest that fractional crystallization was the major differentiation mechanism operating in the various magma chambers, as also noted by Evans et al (1999) for the Kabanga intrusion.…”
Section: The Mukanda-buhoro and Musongati Intrusionssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This evolution is parallel to the mg# variation of both pyroxenes. These characteristics strongly suggest that fractional crystallization was the major differentiation mechanism operating in the various magma chambers, as also noted by Evans et al (1999) for the Kabanga intrusion.…”
Section: The Mukanda-buhoro and Musongati Intrusionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…anorthosites, are not different from the least evolved gabbronorite and pyroxenite. These characteristics suggest (1) that the high Sr initial ratios (second group) probably result from strong local contamination with country rocks, as also observed by Evans et al (1999) in the Kabanga intrusion, and (2) that continuous assimilation during fractional crystallization (AFC process) was not significant. Variations within bodies are not related to structural height in the intrusion and distinct influxes of magma with different isotopic signature cannot be identified.…”
Section: Strontium Initial Ratio In Cumulate Rocksmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence, in these deposits, IPGE were previously concentrated into the crystallizing MSS and the residual Asrich sulfide melt became enriched in the most incompatible noble metals, namely Pd, Pt, and Au. Once arsenide melts form, because arsenide melts are significantly denser than sulfide melts, they tend to concentrate by gravitational accumulation in basal regions of magmatic deposits (e.g., Beni Bousera, Gervilla et al, 1996; Kabanga intrusion, Tanzania, Evans et al, 1999). The wetting behavior of arsenide melt against previously solidified sulfide minerals will play an important role in effectively concentrating the arsenide melt.…”
Section: Geologic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%