2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of the 0–3 Ma palaeomagnetic field observed from the Boring Volcanic Field of the Pacific Northwest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every attempt was made to include only paleodirectional sites that accurately reflect the geomagnetic field; as a result, some studies were excluded from the compilation when demagnetization methods were not clearly stated (i.e., when we could not verify the use of principle component analysis) or if the study authors determined that the in situ integrity of their samples was compromised by tectonic effects and/or deformation. In instances in which a study reexamined or incorporated previously published material we included only the most recent publication to avoid duplicating directional sites (e.g., Antarctica, where Lawrence et al () built on previous work of Tauxe et al (a) and Mankinen and Cox (), and the Boring Volcanic Field where Lhuillier et al () reanalyzed the work of Hagstrum et al ()).…”
Section: The Psv10 Compilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every attempt was made to include only paleodirectional sites that accurately reflect the geomagnetic field; as a result, some studies were excluded from the compilation when demagnetization methods were not clearly stated (i.e., when we could not verify the use of principle component analysis) or if the study authors determined that the in situ integrity of their samples was compromised by tectonic effects and/or deformation. In instances in which a study reexamined or incorporated previously published material we included only the most recent publication to avoid duplicating directional sites (e.g., Antarctica, where Lawrence et al () built on previous work of Tauxe et al (a) and Mankinen and Cox (), and the Boring Volcanic Field where Lhuillier et al () reanalyzed the work of Hagstrum et al ()).…”
Section: The Psv10 Compilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two such estimates were previously obtained on volcanic rocks. The first one ( ε F = 44 ± 5%, N = 47) derived from eruptive units from the Boring Volcanic Field (Oregon, USA) corresponds to the 0–3 Ma interval when polarity reversals occurred in average 5 times per Myr (Lhuillier et al., 2017). The second one ( ε F = 31 ± 4%, N = 28) derived from the Tuoyun volcanics at 112–115 Ma characterizes the behavior of the Earth's magnetic field during the CNS (Lhuillier et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the analysis was performed using the automated Sushibar system in 5 mT steps up 30 mT, then in 10 mT steps up to 90 mT. To account for the variable amounts of NRM remaining after the 90 mT step, we removed by vector subtraction the residual magnetization from all remanence data (Lhuillier et al., 2017). The results were analyzed in the framework of a pseudo‐Arai diagram that compares the remaining NRM with the acquired ARM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations