2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4941351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability study of Si nanowire FETs with different junction gradients

Abstract: Random dopant fluctuation effects of gate-all-around Si nanowire field-effect transistors (FETs) are investigated in terms of different diameters and junction gradients. The nanowire FETs with smaller diameters or shorter junction gradients increase relative variations of the drain currents and the mismatch of the drain currents between source-drain and drain-source bias change in the saturation regime. Smaller diameters decreased current drivability critically compared to standard deviations of the drain curr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both PFETs and NFETs have larger proportions of I on for the top NS channels, but those for PFETs are higher. The top NS channels of the PFETs have greater S/D doping penetrations, affected by the S/D epi above the NS channels, making V th smaller 2,30) and the top NS channels are turned on at smaller V gs than the other NS channels. NFETs have small S/D doping concentrations, and thus all the NS channels are turned on at a similar V th .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both PFETs and NFETs have larger proportions of I on for the top NS channels, but those for PFETs are higher. The top NS channels of the PFETs have greater S/D doping penetrations, affected by the S/D epi above the NS channels, making V th smaller 2,30) and the top NS channels are turned on at smaller V gs than the other NS channels. NFETs have small S/D doping concentrations, and thus all the NS channels are turned on at a similar V th .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the possible variability sources of the S/D regions. Uneven NiSi/Si interface [14] and random dopant fluctuation (RDF) [15,16] can also fluctuate the contact resistivity and thus induce the DC performance variations. Different NiSi/Si contact area by different sili would also affect the DC performance and variations because typical transfer lengths, defined as the distances that carriers below the contact travel before entering into the contact, of SOI devices are in the order of 100 nm [17,18], which is longer than ext .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several parameters from the transfer characteristics are extracted to analyze the DC performance variations: th , lowfield-mobility-related coefficient ( 0 ), and parasitic resistance ( sd ). th values are extracted using CCM or -function method [16,22]. th CCM is measured at th = eff / ⋅10 −8 A, whereas th from -function method ( th ) is extracted from the -axis intercept of the linearly extrapolated curve as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Performance and Variations At Different Silicidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UD-SOI-TFET uses the top lateral contact for both the source and the drain regions while the VG-SOI-TFET uses a side contact for the source and the top lateral contact for the drain region. The minimum g value is set to 1 nm/decade [28][29][30] at N p = 1×10 19 cm −3 while at smaller N p =5×10 18 cm −3 , it is chosen to be g=2 nm/decade, to ensure the drain contact remains ohmic in VG-SOI-TFET. The maximum g value of 5 nm/decade is chosen for both the case.…”
Section: Device Structure and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%