Innovative Developments in Virtual and Physical Prototyping 2011
DOI: 10.1201/b11341-83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Fused Deposition Modelling – analysis of benefits, concept design and tool path generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 3D printed composite samples exhibited a reduction in ΔD x of 74% and ΔD y of 58%, compared with samples manufactured with the ∅ N = 0.8 mm nozzle diameter. These results were in accordance with previous studies (Sukindar et al , 2016), and can be explained by considering that the geometric error increases linearly with nozzle diameter (Brooks et al , 2012). In addition, the use of a smaller nozzle diameter was essential for reproducing fine details, as can be seen in the corner details of the 3D printed composite specimens in Figure 12, where the extruded line rounded the corners instead of reproducing exactly the sharp edges of the CAD model.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These 3D printed composite samples exhibited a reduction in ΔD x of 74% and ΔD y of 58%, compared with samples manufactured with the ∅ N = 0.8 mm nozzle diameter. These results were in accordance with previous studies (Sukindar et al , 2016), and can be explained by considering that the geometric error increases linearly with nozzle diameter (Brooks et al , 2012). In addition, the use of a smaller nozzle diameter was essential for reproducing fine details, as can be seen in the corner details of the 3D printed composite specimens in Figure 12, where the extruded line rounded the corners instead of reproducing exactly the sharp edges of the CAD model.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In general, the pressure drop along the nozzle was higher for small nozzle diameters, causing a reduction in geometrical accuracy. However, according to Brooks et al (2012), geometrical errors increased as nozzle diameter increased, and, hence, a compromise solution between printing time and geometrical quality must be achieved. Thus, further research is required to examine the influence of nozzle diameter on the mechanical and quality performance of 3D printed composites, in particular using short carbon fibre reinforcements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These extruders quickly traverse resolution-insensitive portions of the build while shrinking and slowing to provide additional detail in complex regions. 4 This method allows part surface quality to be maintained while increasing overall throughput. However, uniformly high-resolution parts will still face the same rate limit as in the fixed aperture extruder case.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it makes sense to provide solutions to this limitation first. One suggested method of overcoming the road width limits is to use variable diameter nozzles (Brooks et al, 2011). These nozzles may be continuously variable, allowing tapered roads, or discretely variable.…”
Section: Variable Volumetric Deposition Extrudersmentioning
confidence: 99%