1985
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.31.2248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variance of the distributions of energy levels and of the transition arrays in atomic spectra. III. Case of spin-orbit-split arrays

Abstract: In previous papers formulas for mean wave numbers and spectral widths of transition arrays have been presented. Here the method is extended to the cases nl n'lj'-nl n "lj", (nlj) n'lj'-(nlj) n "lz", and (nlj) +'-(nlj) n'l~', i.e. , when the spectrum exhibits several subarrays, due to the effects of large spin-orbit interactions. The first case is typical of the x-ray transitions between the internal subshells of the atom. The second and the third cases occur in the vuv and x-ray spectra of highly ionized heavy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This good agreement applies to the relative strength of the relativistic sub-arrays whereas in Fig. 4 the SOSA model [3] yields good energies and variances for Tm +47 compared to the DLA results, but incorrect strength ratio of the relativistic sub-arrays (known limitation of SOSA approach [7,8]). In these examples the PRTA offers about 3 orders of magnitude savings in computational effort compared to the full DLA calculation (see Table 1).…”
Section: Calculation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This good agreement applies to the relative strength of the relativistic sub-arrays whereas in Fig. 4 the SOSA model [3] yields good energies and variances for Tm +47 compared to the DLA results, but incorrect strength ratio of the relativistic sub-arrays (known limitation of SOSA approach [7,8]). In these examples the PRTA offers about 3 orders of magnitude savings in computational effort compared to the full DLA calculation (see Table 1).…”
Section: Calculation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This reflects that spin-orbit splitting contributes to the total array variance, but not to the individual relativistic sub-array variance [3].…”
Section: Rpta Model In Intermediate Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A DLA calculation is performed if possible and necessary for all the transition arrays starting from the configuration; DLA computations are carried out only for pairs of configurations giving rise to less than 800,000 lines. In other cases, transition arrays are represented by Gaussian profiles in the UTA (Unresolved Transition Array [22,23]) or SOSA (Spin-Orbit Split Array [24]) formalisms. If the Rydberg supershell contains at least one electron, then transitions starting from the super-configuration are taken into account by the Super Transition Array (STA) model [25].…”
Section: Radiative Opacitymentioning
confidence: 99%