2017
DOI: 10.1159/000478857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variants in Chemosensory Genes Are Associated with Picky Eating Behavior in Preschool-Age Children

Abstract: Background/Aims: Picky eating is prevalent among preschoolers and is associated with risk of both underweight and overweight. Although differences in taste perception may be due to genetic variation, it is unclear whether these variations are related to picky eating behavior. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 5 candidate genes related to chemosensory perception with picky eating behavior and adiposity in a cohort of preschool-aged children. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study results agree with our initial hypothesis and are also in line with already reported differences in food behavior between bitter-sensitive and bitter-insensitive adults and children [28, 46, 47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study results agree with our initial hypothesis and are also in line with already reported differences in food behavior between bitter-sensitive and bitter-insensitive adults and children [28, 46, 47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Previous research already suggested a link between differences in foods preferences and intake (especially for sugar and sweet foods) and genetic sensitivity to bitter taste [10]. Interestingly, our finding agrees with recent work showing that variants in the TAS2R38 gene are associated to pick eating behavior in 2–5-year-old children [28]. Authors showed that homozygous bitter-sensitive children have limited dietary variety and tend to be picky eaters compared to homozygous bitter-insensitive children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Pastorekova et al, 2004) Note: a-chromosome; b-allele 1; c-allele 2; d-distribution of alleles or genotypes in the case group; e-distribution of alleles or genotypes in the control group; f-empirical p-value for chi-square test of independence (permutation test based on the most significant result of allelic dominant and recessive models); g-empirical p-value for Fisher's exact test (permutation test based on the most significant result of allelic dominant and recessive models); h-basic model: genotypic; i-additive model: Cochran-Armitage trend; j-basic model: allelic; k-additive model: dominant; l-additive model: recessive. (Cole et al, 2017) and implicated in taste bud function and salivary buffer capacity (Peres et al, 2010). It was postulated that CA VI may be a mechanistic link between 6-n-propylthiouracil tasting and fungiform taste papilla density and maintenance, (Melis et al,) but a later study did not detect such an association (Feeney & Hayes, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite links between both genetic and environmental factors being responsible for picky eating, this complexity (genetics and environment) is under-researched [12]. To date, only one cross-sectional study (n = 153) on preschool children aged 2-5 years reported that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes related to chemosensory perception (TAS2R38, rs713598 and CA6, rs2274327) were associated with picky eating [23]. Interestingly, the study did not use PROP for endophenotype bitter taste sensitivity testing, despite PROP being considered a cost-effective, non-invasive approach for community-based and epidemiological studies [24] and no environmental determinants of picky eating (e.g., children's food preferences, child-feeding practices) were considered [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%