“…Earlier, we reported on the dynamics of LYS, MET, and CYS and their relationships with protein and other phytochemicals in the maize kernel ( Jaradat and Goldstein, 2013) and provided multivariate statistical evidence at different hierarchical levels, including HGEs, populations, and accessions within populations, indicating that the nutritional quality of maize kernels is influenced by many factors, including genetic background of endosperm texture, inbreeding level, phytochemical composition, and the direct and indirect interactions between and within physicochemical traits. The current study provided in-depth analyses and interpretation of results beyond what can be gleaned, for example, from classical assessment of protein content and its nutritional quality as described by amino acid composition (Fufa et al, 2003), phenotypic characterization of quality protein endosperm as described by desirable combinations of high amino acid content and endosperm vitreousness (Gutierrez-Rojas et al, 2008), or physical and compositional characterization of hybrids between exotic and adapted maize lines as described by test weight, thousand kernel weight, absolute density, and starch, protein, and oil contents (Taboada-Gaytan et al, 2010). The current study provided in-depth analyses and interpretation of results beyond what can be gleaned, for example, from classical assessment of protein content and its nutritional quality as described by amino acid composition (Fufa et al, 2003), phenotypic characterization of quality protein endosperm as described by desirable combinations of high amino acid content and endosperm vitreousness (Gutierrez-Rojas et al, 2008), or physical and compositional characterization of hybrids between exotic and adapted maize lines as described by test weight, thousand kernel weight, absolute density, and starch, protein, and oil contents (Taboada-Gaytan et al, 2010).…”