2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00797.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation among populations ofDiodia teres(Rubiaceae) in environmental maternal effects

Abstract: Previous studies have quantified variation in environmental maternal effects (EME) within populations, but these effects could differ among populations as well. In this study we grew clonal replicates of individuals from three populations of the annual plant Diodia teres in their native and non‐native environments. Our goal was to estimate the effects of maternal environment and maternal population on seed and seedling traits. Seeds that were produced in this field study were then planted in two soil types to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, extraXoral nectar production in C. fasciculata is heritable (Rutter and Rausher 2004). It is possible that the observed population diVerences in the greenhouse could be due to environmental or genetic maternal eVects (Hereford and Moriuchi 2005); however, we found little evidence for such eVects through seed size (the main avenue of such eVects; Roach and WulV 1987) and, in particular, none for eVects on nectar production. Maternal eVects could be expressed as cross-generational induction, but in the only system studied in detail, such eVects were not found beyond the one to two true leaf stage of young seedlings (Agrawal 2002).…”
Section: Ecological and Evolutionary Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, extraXoral nectar production in C. fasciculata is heritable (Rutter and Rausher 2004). It is possible that the observed population diVerences in the greenhouse could be due to environmental or genetic maternal eVects (Hereford and Moriuchi 2005); however, we found little evidence for such eVects through seed size (the main avenue of such eVects; Roach and WulV 1987) and, in particular, none for eVects on nectar production. Maternal eVects could be expressed as cross-generational induction, but in the only system studied in detail, such eVects were not found beyond the one to two true leaf stage of young seedlings (Agrawal 2002).…”
Section: Ecological and Evolutionary Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is increasingly apparent that these maternal effects are widespread in nature, having been particularly well studied in plants [5] and invertebrates [4,[6][7][8]. Maternal effects are recognized as an important mechanism for a rapid multi-generational response to changes in the environment [8][9][10], and are central to the broader field of indirect genetic effects [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results agree with other studies reporting larger offspring phenotypes of seeds coming from favourable maternal environments (Leishman et al, 2000;Castro et al, 2006). However, whether this maternal environmental effect is merely an indirect consequence of SM differences between environments or whether it may be an active transgenerational response mediated by other epigenetic mechanisms remains an unresolved question (Hereford and Moriuchi, 2005;Boyko and Kovalchuk, 2011;Cendán et al, 2012). Our data show Seed mass (mg) Seedling total dry weight (mg) Figure 3 Linear relationship between the seed mass and the seedling total dry weight for the two maternal environments as obtained from a heterogenous slope covariation mixed model.…”
Section: Maternal Environmental Effects On Sm Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been used to account for this potential bias in quantitative genetic studies. Including SM as a covariate in the statistical analyses has been probably the most frequent (Hereford and Moriuchi, 2005;Hovenden et al, 2008;Cendán et al, 2012) but this method is generally insufficient to cover all maternal effects, as effects unrelated to seed provisioning remain unaccounted for (Cendán et al, 2012). Alternatively, maternal effects may be controlled by growing parental genotypes in a common environment for at least one generation before genetic testing (Bischoff and Mueller-Schaerer, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%