Variation in Acrylic Inclined Plane Application

Furman, Robert; Niemiec, Brook A.

doi:10.1177/089875641303000305

Cited by 10 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is typically used for uncomplicated cases of LMC teeth in dogs. 9 Although the method for TCE has been mentioned in the veterinary literature during the past two decades, 2,4,8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] to our knowledge, there are no case reports or case series studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. The main principle of TCE is to guide the displaced canine tooth into its desired position by extending the crown with either acrylate or composite so that it contacts the labial aspect of the gingiva and alveolar mucosa in the diastema between the maxillary third incisor and canine tooth (with normal occlusion) or distal to the maxillary canine tooth (in the case of a severe mandibular distocclusion).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3 Temporary crown extensions (TCEs) built onto LMC teeth for corrective orthodontics have previously been described in the literature, representing a fixed appliance that exerts a passive, intermittent force. 1,8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] However, case series studies on the use of TCE have not been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of TCE as an orthodontic appliance to correct LMC teeth in client-owned dogs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)

Storli¹,

Menzies

Reiter

2018

J Vet Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A search of the medical and dental records at Evidensia Lørenskog Dyreklinikk, in Lørenskog, Norway, was conducted to identify dogs that received temporary crown extensions (TCEs) to correct linguoverted mandibular canine (LMC) teeth over a 54-month investigation period (2012-2016). Criteria for inclusion into the study were the presence of complete medical and dental records, pre- and postoperative clinical photographs and intraoral radiographs of the affected canine teeth, adequate information pertaining to the procedures performed, and at least 1 follow-up >3 months after appliance removal. Seventy-two dogs with LMC teeth were treated with TCE. Thirty-nine breeds were represented in this study. Mean age at the time of appliance installation was 6.4 (range, 4.7-13.4 months [median, 5.9 months] months). Fifty-three (73.6%) dogs presented with class I malocclusion, 14 (19.5%) dogs with class II malocclusion, and 5 (6.9%) dogs with class III malocclusion. Twenty-five (34.7%) dogs were considered to have mild, 32 (44.4%) dogs to have moderate, and 15 (20.8%) dogs to have severe mandibular canine malocclusion. The TCE was combined with other treatment modalities (active orthodontics, extraction of nonstrategic teeth, gingivectomy, and inclined bite plane and ball therapy) to correct mandibular canine tooth malocclusions in 19 (26.4%) dogs. Fractured or detached crown extensions were seen in 9 (12.5%) dogs. Soft tissue ulceration or inflammation was seen in 7 (9.7%) dogs. The mandibular canine teeth occlusion resolved completely with self-retaining, functional, nontraumatic occlusion in 56 (77.8%) dogs. Fifteen dogs (20.8%) resolved with functional, nontraumatic occlusion, but the mandibular canine teeth were too short to be perfectly self-retained, thus left with 1- to 2-mm crown extensions for permanent retention. In 1 (1.4%) dog, both mandibular canine teeth relapsed almost back to original position. The results show that TCE is a viable treatment option to correct LMC teeth in young dogs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)

Storli¹,

Menzies

Reiter

2018

J Vet Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Loss of the mandibular canine teeth may add to decreased function in dogs with an already shortened mandible. 6 Extraction of these teeth can cause loss of mandibular function, risk of iatrogenic mandibular fracture, and postoperative tongue protrusion. 6,7 If the positioning of the mandibular canine tooth causes traumatic contact on the palatal aspect of its maxillary counterpart, the maxillary canine tooth may be extracted, provided that the trauma point is not occurring so medially that extraction of the maxillary canine tooth might not solve the problem.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maxillary Canine Tooth Extraction for Class 2 Malocclusion in a Dog

Angel¹

2016

J Vet Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Malocclusion in dogs is commonly diagnosed in puppies when the primary dentition is present. Interceptive orthodontic treatment may be elected to temporarily resolve painful contact points with the primary dentition. However, the adult dentition must be monitored closely and treated to achieve a lifelong, pain-free occlusion. This case report illustrates interceptive orthodontic treatment of deciduous and permanent dentition to treat a class 2 malocclusion in a dog. Extraction of the permanent maxillary canine tooth was elected to resolve abnormal contact from the mandibular canine in a single anesthetic episode. This treatment option allowed the patient to salvage the structure and function of the mandibular canine, avoid complications associated with mandibular canine extraction, and negate the need for lifelong follow-up of endodontic therapy.

show abstract

“…More conventional orthodontic movement can be achieved using an inclined plane orthodontic appliance (IPOA) (Furman and Niemiec 2013). These appliances are manufactured either chairside or by a dental laboratory, after taking dental impressions and casting stone models (Fig 14).…”

Section: Relative and True Mandibular Canine Linguoversionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Malocclusion in cats and dogs

Perry¹

2017

In Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A malocclusion is a discrepancy of alignment in opposing dental arches or an abnormal relationship between teeth when the mouth is closed. These discrepancies may be congenital, developmental or acquired. This article discusses the development of malocclusions and their associated consequences, describes ideal occlusion and reviews classification of malocclusions. It also discusses the most common malocclusions seen in cats and dogs, and describes potential treatments.

show abstract

Variation in Acrylic Inclined Plane Application

Cited by 10 publications

References 4 publications

Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)

Assessment of Temporary Crown Extensions to Correct Linguoverted Mandibular Canine Teeth in 72 Client-Owned Dogs (2012-2016)

Maxillary Canine Tooth Extraction for Class 2 Malocclusion in a Dog

Malocclusion in cats and dogs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About