2003
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in ancient Egyptian stature and body proportions

Abstract: Stature and the pattern of body proportions were investigated in a series of six time-successive Egyptian populations in order to investigate the biological effects on human growth of the development and intensification of agriculture, and the formation of state-level social organization. Univariate analyses of variance were performed to assess differences between the sexes and among various time periods. Significant differences were found both in stature and in raw long bone length measurements between the ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
59
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
59
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Aufderheide & Rodríguez-Martín (1998) defined gigantic stature as three or more standard deviations above the mean stature of the population. The stature of 192.4 cm for skeleton 2507X is greater than three standard deviations above the mean statures reported by Zakrzewski (2003) for ancient Egyptian groups. Stature comparisons between 2507X and each of these population means are highly significantly different (P < 0.001), with z scores of 4.47, 6.56 and 5.10 for the Early Dynastic, Old and Middle Kingdoms, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aufderheide & Rodríguez-Martín (1998) defined gigantic stature as three or more standard deviations above the mean stature of the population. The stature of 192.4 cm for skeleton 2507X is greater than three standard deviations above the mean statures reported by Zakrzewski (2003) for ancient Egyptian groups. Stature comparisons between 2507X and each of these population means are highly significantly different (P < 0.001), with z scores of 4.47, 6.56 and 5.10 for the Early Dynastic, Old and Middle Kingdoms, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Robins & Shute (1986) reported average male stature of 168.7 cm using the femur and 169.4 cm using the humerus in a sample of predynastic skeletons from Naqada. Zakrzewski (2003) provided stature estimates for Egyptians from various time periods using the formulae revised for ancient Egyptians presented by Robins & Shute (1986). Early Dynastic, Old Kingdom and Middle Kingdom males had mean statures of 169.6 AE 5.1 cm (n ¼ 11), 168.8 AE 3.6 cm (n ¼ 16) and 166.4 AE 5.1 cm (n ¼ 13), respectively, based on femoral and tibial length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kerma skeletons were excavated in the ''Eastern Cemetery '' by Reisner in 1913'' by Reisner in -1914'' by Reisner in and 1915'' by Reisner in -1916, and date between 2000 and 1550 BC (Keita, 1988;Filer, 1992;Zakrzewski, 2003). Kerma was the capital of the Kingdom of Kush in Upper Nubia (Hafsaas-Tsakos, 2009).…”
Section: Osteological Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes to stature and/or body mass within a population over time as reflected in skeletal samples, can be interpreted as indicating a response to environmental stressors (e.g., resource availability, population density, disease, etc.) (Zakrzewski, 2003(Zakrzewski, , 2007Pfeiffer and Sealy, 2006;Stynder et al, 2007;Giannecchini and Moggi-Cecchi, 2008;Ginter, 2008). Recent research relating to stature and body mass estimation in various skeletal populations (e.g., Auerbach and Ruff, 2004;Raxter et al, 2006Raxter et al, , 2008Giannecchini and Moggi-Cecchi, 2007;Smith, 2007;Ruff, 2007;Scuilli and Blatt, 2008) emphasizes the importance of these variables to anthropologists in archaeological and forensic contexts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%