2011
DOI: 10.1177/030089161109700502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in gynecological oncology follow-up practice: Attributable to cancer centers or to patient characteristics? A Piedmont Regional Oncology Network Study

Abstract: Much of the unexplained variability in the follow-up for gynecological malignancies is attributable to different habits of centers belonging to a cancer network. These results prompted us to design a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare minimalist versus intensive follow-up programs in endometrial cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of affected individuals are diagnosed early and usually cured with surgery alone or in combination with radiatiotherapy [27]. However, mortality rate of this cancer has experienced a sharper rise than its incidence over the last decades [28][29][30][31]. Despite all the development in therapeutic strategies for this malignancy, end-stage patients face poor prognoses, and the 5-year survival rate is as low as 25-45% [26].…”
Section: Curcumin and Endometrial Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of affected individuals are diagnosed early and usually cured with surgery alone or in combination with radiatiotherapy [27]. However, mortality rate of this cancer has experienced a sharper rise than its incidence over the last decades [28][29][30][31]. Despite all the development in therapeutic strategies for this malignancy, end-stage patients face poor prognoses, and the 5-year survival rate is as low as 25-45% [26].…”
Section: Curcumin and Endometrial Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the TOTEM trial did not show any improvement in OS and in early detection of relapses for patients treated for endometrial cancer and followed with a 5-year INT regimen of follow-up, independently from their risk of relapse. More recent guidelines have moved toward less INT follow-up regimens, [3][4][5] but in the early 2000s, recommendations on follow-up in patients with endometrial cancer were contradictory, and the follow-up schemes adopted by the centers were heterogeneous, 13,[23][24][25][26][27] being the existing evidence derived from small retrospective/historical cohort studies. Because the follow-up represents a high time and resource consuming activity 28 and the urgent need for a large and well-designed RCT was highlighted, 29 the TOTEM study was set up in 2008 as a large, pragmatic, randomized trial to test whether a more INT regimen of follow-up could improve the OS in patients treated for endometrial cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] The follow-up requires a considerable investment of clinical resources 6,7 although there is a surprisingly scarcity of evidence supporting the effectiveness of follow-up in either improving survival or quality of life in patients with cancer 8 and low agreement among guidelines. 9 Moreover, adherence to guidelines is low, barely 50%, 10 and intensive (INT) follow-up regimens, with multiple scheduled visits and examinations, are widely adopted 11 at least in Southern Europe, 6,12,13 maybe because of a supposed utility and for medicolegal issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that the majority of endometrial cancer is detected early and often cured with surgery alone or in combination with radiation therapy. However, over the past 15 years the rate of increase in mortality from endometrial cancer has accelerated faster than the incidence of the disease [14]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%