1984
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in lettuce plants regenerated from protoplasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, 42% of the primary regenerants exhibited some loss in fertility, the genetic basis of which is not known. Engler and Grogan [6] have reported that lettuce plants regenerated from leaf mesophyll protoplasts frequently show similar infertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also, 42% of the primary regenerants exhibited some loss in fertility, the genetic basis of which is not known. Engler and Grogan [6] have reported that lettuce plants regenerated from leaf mesophyll protoplasts frequently show similar infertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Protoc1onal variation also was reported for rice (Abdullah et al, 1989;Ogura et al, 1987) and several other crops (Engler and Grogan, 1984;Lörz and Scowcroft, 1983;Shahin and Spivey, 1986;Shepard et al, 1980). The field performance of 125 R1 plants regenerated from protoplasts of four japonica cultivars was reported by Ogura et al , (1987).…”
Section: Useful Clonal Variation In Cereal Cropsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Selection of somaclonal variants has successfully been used to generate cultivars in a number of plants, including apple (Donovan et al 1994), banana (Cote et al 1993), celery (Heath-Pagliuso et al 1988), cucumber (Burza and Malepszy 1995;Filipecki et al 2005), garlic (Novak et al 1982), lettuce (Engler and Grogan 1984), peach (Hammerschlag 1990), strawberry (Swartz et al 1981;Toyoda et al 1991;Takahashi et al1992;Hammerschlag et al 2006), and tomato (Evans and Sharp 1983;Barden et al 1986). Although it is important to use a regeneration method that results in a high frequency of somaclonal variation in the regenerated plants so as to efficiently select useful somaclonal variants (Ezura et al 1995), in Japanese butterbur, it was difficult to control the high frequency occurrence of undesirable variation, which was observed in the regenerants from callus cultures (Morishita 1991).…”
Section: ϫ2mentioning
confidence: 99%