2008
DOI: 10.1080/02841860701864668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in radiation sensitivity and repair kinetics in different parts of the spinal cord

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The white matter of the brain is more vulnerable to radiation than the gray matter when the changes are evaluated clinically, pathologically, or radiologically. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Steen et al studied the effect of therapeutic radiation on the central nervous system in pediatric brain tumor patients. 10,11 Their quantitative MRI analyses revealed that a radiation dose greater than 30 Gy was associated with a spin-lattice relaxation time decrease in the white matter in a doseand time-dependent manner 3 months after radiotherapy onwards, while such change was not detectable within the dose level under 60 Gy in the gray matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The white matter of the brain is more vulnerable to radiation than the gray matter when the changes are evaluated clinically, pathologically, or radiologically. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Steen et al studied the effect of therapeutic radiation on the central nervous system in pediatric brain tumor patients. 10,11 Their quantitative MRI analyses revealed that a radiation dose greater than 30 Gy was associated with a spin-lattice relaxation time decrease in the white matter in a doseand time-dependent manner 3 months after radiotherapy onwards, while such change was not detectable within the dose level under 60 Gy in the gray matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the radiation dose received by the thoracic spine is well below the recognized tolerance dose and the doses previously reported with progressive myelopathy [4, 9]. According to previous studies, the spinal cord shows a high fractionation sensitivity, typical for late-responding normal tissues and characterized by a low ratio of the linear-quadratic parameters of the cell survival curve (α/β) [911]. When calculating the linear-quadratic equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction (LQED 2 ), or the biologically equivalent dose if given in 2 Gy-fractions (for the cases when the daily fractions were higher than 2 Gy), some authors have estimated that an appropriate α/β ratio was close to 2 Gy [10], while others have favored an even lower value of 0.9 [11] or 0.87 Gy [4, 9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies, the spinal cord shows a high fractionation sensitivity, typical for late-responding normal tissues and characterized by a low ratio of the linear-quadratic parameters of the cell survival curve (α/β) [911]. When calculating the linear-quadratic equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction (LQED 2 ), or the biologically equivalent dose if given in 2 Gy-fractions (for the cases when the daily fractions were higher than 2 Gy), some authors have estimated that an appropriate α/β ratio was close to 2 Gy [10], while others have favored an even lower value of 0.9 [11] or 0.87 Gy [4, 9]. Using this latter value, the estimated probability of myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord was found to be 0.03% for a total dose of 45 Gy and 0.2% for 50 Gy [9], or < 1% and < 10% for 54 Gy and 61 Gy, using conventional fractionation of 1.8–2 Gy/fraction [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even after applying an α/β of 2 Gy an EQD 2 of 45 Gy is still considered to be safe. Using the data of Schultheiss [ 13 ], evaluating the radiation dose response for cervical spinal cord to be more sensitive than thoracic [ 14 ], we can assume that a probability of myelopathy at EQD 2 45 Gy is lower than 0.03 percent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%