2020
DOI: 10.1177/1077559520922313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in States’ Implementation of CAPTA’s Substance-Exposed Infants Mandates: A Policy Diffusion Analysis

Abstract: In 2016, federal law changed state child welfare mandates related to prenatally substance-exposed infants. Little is known regarding the status or implications of policy implementation. The current study examined thematic clusters among states’ policies responsive to this 2016 mandate. Cluster analysis identified four distinct categories of states’ implementation: (1) “innovators/early adopters,” (2) “early majority,” (3) “late majority,” and (4) “laggards.” Innovator/early adopter states ( n = 14) were most l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1. Scholars have also studied how federal law changed state child welfare mandates. The research shows that states do not uniformly implement changes in federal law with states being “innovators/early adopters,” “early majority,” “late majority,” or “laggards” (Sieger & Rebbe 2020). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1. Scholars have also studied how federal law changed state child welfare mandates. The research shows that states do not uniformly implement changes in federal law with states being “innovators/early adopters,” “early majority,” “late majority,” or “laggards” (Sieger & Rebbe 2020). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the family‐focused, public health‐based family care plans under this reauthorization certainly seem to represent a sea‐change in child welfare policy that has long focused on the child's safety to, at times, the exclusion of the caregiver‐child dyad, no scholarship has explored the theoretical implications of this policy, including how the CAPTA reauthorization could achieve the goals of dyadic health, development, and safety. The CAPTA reauthorization's goals are lofty both due to the conceptual divergence from extant child welfare practice and given the historically slow implementation of CAPTA's provisions related to substance‐exposed infants (SEIs) (Chasnoff, Barber, Brook, & Akin, 2018; Lloyd Sieger & Rebbe, 2020). Moreover, no research has tested whether CAPTA “works” for this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%