2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.10.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of atmospheric radon concentration with bimodal seasonality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation results are consistent with seasonal wind patterns, clearly established for this region: in winter, northwest prevailing winds convey continental air masses, where are some of the major identified sources (Russia, Europe, and North America); in summer, southeast prevailing winds convey oceanic air masses, with no major sources upwind (similar to the example shown for CN20‐Beijing, in Figure ). Besides, the seasonal cycle of atmospheric radon has clearly been established in the region and is consistent with the wind seasonal variations (e.g., Kobayashi et al, ; Omori et al, ) and similar to the simulation results obtained for Xe‐133 in the present study. However, no obvious seasonal variations are observed in measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Simulation results are consistent with seasonal wind patterns, clearly established for this region: in winter, northwest prevailing winds convey continental air masses, where are some of the major identified sources (Russia, Europe, and North America); in summer, southeast prevailing winds convey oceanic air masses, with no major sources upwind (similar to the example shown for CN20‐Beijing, in Figure ). Besides, the seasonal cycle of atmospheric radon has clearly been established in the region and is consistent with the wind seasonal variations (e.g., Kobayashi et al, ; Omori et al, ) and similar to the simulation results obtained for Xe‐133 in the present study. However, no obvious seasonal variations are observed in measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…That is, radon concentration was overestimated by a factor of up to two when radon and thoron concentrations were the same as each other. Ishikawa [17] carried out a different experiment, in which he investigated a pulse-ionization chamber monitor, the AlphaGUARD PQ2000Pro (Genitron Instruments, GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany)-now Bertin Technologies (Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France)); this monitor is widely used in environmental studies (see, for example, [22][23][24]). In Ishikawa's study [17], the chamber monitor was exposed to radon-bearing and thoron-bearing air in a calibration chamber constructed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory in New York, and a thoron infiltration rate of about 10% was seen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radon concentration in atmosphere is about one-hundredth and one-thousandth of concentration in soil air 13 and in ground water 3 , respectively. Radon concentration in the atmosphere usually varies throughout the year because of seasonal factors 14 . Subsurface structural changes can involve exhalation of radon from the ground surface, and the atmospheric radon concentration reflects the averaged value of this exhalation over a wide area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%