1999
DOI: 10.1127/entom.gen/24/1999/125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of Postembryonic Development Time and Number of Nymphal Instars on a Small Spatial Scale in Central European Grasshoppers (Caelifera: Acrididae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I. monthly temperatures than those in the south (Curitiba, Carrasco) (Figure 1; Adis et al, 2004), and less pronounced winters. This influence would appear to agree with that reported in previous studies (Roff, 1992;Schädler & Witsack, 1999), where season length and development time (via female body size) have both been shown to influence growth function/patterns in grasshoppers. In addition, Roff (1980) has shown that at a certain point an increase in these variables makes it physically possible, and reproductively advantageous, to reduce the development time of single univoltine Table I. nymphs (so reducing the number of instar stages), and allow a second nymph to be produced within a seasonal environment (bivoltinism).…”
Section: Historical Structure and The Influence Of Current Climatic Vsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Table I. monthly temperatures than those in the south (Curitiba, Carrasco) (Figure 1; Adis et al, 2004), and less pronounced winters. This influence would appear to agree with that reported in previous studies (Roff, 1992;Schädler & Witsack, 1999), where season length and development time (via female body size) have both been shown to influence growth function/patterns in grasshoppers. In addition, Roff (1980) has shown that at a certain point an increase in these variables makes it physically possible, and reproductively advantageous, to reduce the development time of single univoltine Table I. nymphs (so reducing the number of instar stages), and allow a second nymph to be produced within a seasonal environment (bivoltinism).…”
Section: Historical Structure and The Influence Of Current Climatic Vsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This allows females to become considerably larger than males in milder conditions, similarly to what was observed in C. cazurroi and C. yersini . Notably, C. parallelus is one of the few Chorthippus of which the female is unable to change the number of instars during development when exposed to varying heat supplies (Schädler & Witsack, ). This implies that this species may respond less readily to shifting thermal conditions as compared to its congeners, a fact that may constrain its distribution to the mildest niche and impede an upward expansion as species showing a greater flexibility of responses (Hodkinson, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, C. parallelus exhibits a very strong positive size cline ratio (i.e., greater variability in male size; Fig. 2b) and is one of the few species in the Chorthippus genus for which females cannot alter the number of instars during development (Schädler and Witsack 1999). This fixed instar number may act to constrain variability in female body size across altitudinal gradients; hence the observations of Laiolo et al (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%