Variation partitioning in canonical ordination reveals no effect of soil but an effect of co‐occurring species on translocation success in Iris atrofusca

Abstract

Summary1. Despite being expensive, complicated and less successful than the conservation of primary habitat, translocation is rapidly gaining importance as a conservation approach due to accelerated loss of natural environment. Finding the optimal abiotic and biotic conditions needed for successful translocation of plants can be difficult for species with limited information on prior distribution. Unfortunately, this is often the case with endangered plant species, including those urgently needing action.2. We present a method of evaluating the relative importance of multiple environmental parameters in translocation success. This method is based on the application of variation partitioning in canonical ordination and it allows usage of not only multiple independent biotic and abiotic variables, but also multiple dependent variables for fitness estimates. 3. In this study, six soil parameters together with the abundance of 61 plant species and their total biomass were used to explain the variation in translocation success of Iris atrofusca plants among 22 microsites. The relative importance of each of the three factors was estimated using ordination techniques. 4. Soil characteristics and total biomass of other plants did not significantly affect the performance of translocated irises, but the species composition of the surrounding vegetation did have a significant effect. The abundance of relatively rare species was closely correlated with iris performance. It is likely that these species do not affect the irises directly but instead represent environmental conditions not measured in this study, which are necessary for the survival of irises. 5. Synthesis and applications. Variation partitioning appears to be a highly promising method for planning the translocation of plants and evaluating success due to its ability to estimate the unique contribution of each of two or more sets of environmental factors. It can be used to monitor success, and to identify the key contributory factors, in experimental translocations preceding actual introduction of plants in conservation programmes.

Effects of landscape heterogeneity on the elevated trace metal concentrations in agricultural soils at multiple scales in the Pearl River Delta, South China

“…However, PCA is difficult to differentiate the effect of each pollutant source for trace metals (Bakalian et al, 2010;Rodriguez et al, 2008). Partial redundancy analysis (PRDA), an extension of RDA, proves to be a robust technique to identify the relative influences of two or more sets of independent variables to explain the variation in dependent variables by variation partitioning in ecology and vegetation science (Horak and Pavlicek, 2013;Legendre, 2008;Peres-Neto et al, 2006;Volis et al, 2011). Although this is a promising technique, it has not been extensively used in soil contamination studies.…”

Effects of Impervious Surface on the Spatial Distribution of Urban Waterlogging Risk Spots at Multiple Scales in Guangzhou, South China

“…It is a robust means of exploring the relative importance of two or three groups of explanatory variables (independent variables). The working principle behind partial redundancy analysis is variation partitioning [60][61][62][63]. In this procedure, it usually does not quantify the effects of just two explanatory variables.…”

Soil heterogeneity and the distribution of native grasses in California: Can soil properties inform restoration plans?

“…Much of the current research investigates the contribution of spatial and environmental variation to species range limits and niche availability (e.g., Pan et al 1998, McCrea et al 2001, Zhang et al 2011. Fewer studies have applied plant-environment and spatial relationships to ecological restoration with the goal of predicting suitable sites for revegetation using selected plant taxa (Allen and Wilson 1991, Corry and McEachern 2000, Volis et al 2011. These studies offer the potential to improve restoration outcomes via a better understanding of the factors that drive species' distributions.…”