2015
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201300868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in Growth, Clonal and Sexual Reproduction of Spartina alterniflora Responding to Changes in Clonal Integration and Sand Burial

Abstract: Research ArticleVariations in Growth, Clonal and Sexual Reproduction of Spartina alterniflora Responding to Changes in Clonal Integration and Sand BurialClonal plants can shift their allocation to growth, clonal, and sexual reproduction under different conditions. To test this hypothesis, a greenhouse experiment was conducted to explore the effects of sand burial degrees and clonal integration on the trade-offs among growth, clonal, and sexual reproduction in an invasive species, Spartina alterniflora. Ramets … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, feeding belowground uses more energy than feeding aboveground as it requires crabs to dig burrows (Vu and Pennings 2018), and big crabs have greater energy reserves than small crabs. Belowground disturbance can also lead to an increase in sexual reproduction in clonal plants (Xiao et al 2015), consistent with the observed effects of big crabs on Spartina in our field study. Grazing patterns may also differ aboveground: In mesocosms, we found that big crabs grazed a larger proportion of leaves overall (Appendix : Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, feeding belowground uses more energy than feeding aboveground as it requires crabs to dig burrows (Vu and Pennings 2018), and big crabs have greater energy reserves than small crabs. Belowground disturbance can also lead to an increase in sexual reproduction in clonal plants (Xiao et al 2015), consistent with the observed effects of big crabs on Spartina in our field study. Grazing patterns may also differ aboveground: In mesocosms, we found that big crabs grazed a larger proportion of leaves overall (Appendix : Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this case, lower stem density and mean height than expected in mixed‐crab plots may result from big crabs feeding more intensely on each stem, or from belowground rhizome consumption by big crabs impeding recovery from simultaneous aboveground consumption by small crabs (Tolvanen 1994). Consistent with these synergistic effects being due to different feeding behavior among size classes, flowering was stimulated less than expected in mixed plots, likely because reduced density of big crabs led to a reduction in belowground disturbance to ramets (Xiao et al 2015). Surprisingly, we saw no synergistic effect of mixed crabs on biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Alternatively, some models have shown that clonal growth occurs when mother ramets show decreased growth and sexual reproduction (Xiao et al. ). As in other studies of Lentibulariaceae (Worley and Harder ) and Ranunculus reptans (Prati and Schmid ), populations tend to show negative correlations for the resource allocation pattern between clonal growth and sexual reproduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Xiao et al. ). Meanwhile, with the capacity for clonal integration, clonal plants can display a division of labor in resource‐acquisition duties, manifested as a local specialization by certain ramets, which enhances acquisition of the greatest abundance of each resource from the surrounding environment (Hutchings and Wijesinghe ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, because saltmarshes are so productive and therefore of interest with respect to support of food webs and mediation of the global carbon cycle, the focus has largely been on how variation in saltmarsh biogeochemistry and other abiotic drivers affects plant productivity (Mendelssohn & Morris, 2002;Morris, Sundberg, & Hopkinson, 2013). A great deal has been learned about these topics, but issues of plant allometry and life-history theory have largely been ignored (but see Xiao, Tang, Qing, Zhou, & An, 2011a, Xiao, Tang, Qing, Zhou, Kong, et al, 2011bXiao et al, 2015;Crosby et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%