2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in gynecologic oncology training in low (LIC) and middle income (MIC) countries (LMICs): Common efforts and challenges

Abstract: Gynecologic cancer, cervical cancer in particular, is disproportionately represented in the developing world where mortality is also high. Screening programs, increased availability of chemotherapy, and an awareness of HIV-related cancers have in part accelerated a need for physicians who can treat these cancers, yet the infrastructure for such training is often lacking. In this paper, we address the variations in gynecology oncology training in LMICs as well as the ubiquitous challenges, in an effort to guide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While efforts to establish gynecologic oncology training programs in LMICS are underway, at present they are insufficient in number to meet the current and growing demand. In Africa, for instance, there are only 6 formal gynecologic oncology training programs (South Africa, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia) ( Johnston et al, 2017 ) and most are in their infancy. While necessary and commendable, the establishment of such programs requires considerable resources, infrastructure, commitment and time to develop and mature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While efforts to establish gynecologic oncology training programs in LMICS are underway, at present they are insufficient in number to meet the current and growing demand. In Africa, for instance, there are only 6 formal gynecologic oncology training programs (South Africa, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia) ( Johnston et al, 2017 ) and most are in their infancy. While necessary and commendable, the establishment of such programs requires considerable resources, infrastructure, commitment and time to develop and mature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our competency-based, intensive surgical oncology training approach can complement ongoing international efforts to expand formal gynecologic oncology training opportunities for physicians practicing in LMICs ( Johnston et al, 2017 ). However, lack of a certification system for those trained under this arrangement can potentially demotivate local physicians from engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither surgical nor gynecologic societies can certify professionals who dedicate themselves to gynecologic cancer treatment, hampering gynecologic oncology training in the country. 11 There is no data regarding who are the OB-GYNs involved in women's cancer care in Brazil or those who are more dedicated to gynecologic oncology. Therefore, the present study aims to obtain basic demographic information, the level of interest and of training in gynecologic oncology among OB-GYNs.…”
Section: Descritoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most structured training programs do not stipulate a minimum number of procedures required for accreditation as a gynecologic oncologist; instead the emphasis is on the overall volume of surgical exposure and some form of assessment process during training. Regions with structured training programs have identified a need for exposure to extended scope surgical procedures . This is largely related to extended cytoreductive procedures in surgical management of ovarian cancer.…”
Section: Training In Gynecologic Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regions with structured training programs have identified a need for exposure to extended scope surgical procedures. 3 This is largely related to extended cytoreductive procedures in surgical management of ovarian cancer. Trainee surveys have identified the inability of some training programs to provide adequate experience in general surgical procedures.…”
Section: Training In Gynecologic Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%