1995
DOI: 10.1029/95gb01144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations of atmospheric methane supply from the Sea of Okhotsk induced by the seasonal ice cover

Abstract: Thus the estimated 0.6 Tg of ice-induced methane dynamics in northern latitudes can hardly explain this seasonal signal. However, the effects of seasonal ice cover on pulsed release of methane appear strong enough to contribute, in concert with other seasonal sources, to characteristic short-term wobbles in the atmospheric methane budget which are observed between 50øN and 60øN.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figures 2–4 anomalously high concentrations of methane were observed in waters near the bottom of the eastern shelfbreak at a depth of approximately 200 m in every year (1998, 1999, and 2000), due to methane seepage from an underlying oil field [ Ginsburg et al , 1993; Lammers et al , 1995]. The methane concentration in the near‐bottom water along line E was relatively low compared to those of lines B and C at the south, clearly showing that thermogenic methane sources are not uniformly distributed geographically over the shelf northeast of Sakhalin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figures 2–4 anomalously high concentrations of methane were observed in waters near the bottom of the eastern shelfbreak at a depth of approximately 200 m in every year (1998, 1999, and 2000), due to methane seepage from an underlying oil field [ Ginsburg et al , 1993; Lammers et al , 1995]. The methane concentration in the near‐bottom water along line E was relatively low compared to those of lines B and C at the south, clearly showing that thermogenic methane sources are not uniformly distributed geographically over the shelf northeast of Sakhalin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average emission rate in the western part of the Sea of Okhotsk (0.73 × 10 6 km 2 , ∼51% of the total) was estimated to be 11 Gg CH 4 yr −1 . On the basis of methane data observed in the northeastern shelf off Sakhalin in March 1991 and July 1992 along with a constant wind speed of 7 m s −1 , Lammers et al [1995] gave a sea‐air flux of 130 Gg CH 4 yr −1 in the entire Sea of Okhotsk, which was about 32% of the global flux (405 Gg CH 4 yr −1 ) given by Bates et al [1996]. They reported a remarkably high sea‐air methane flux (150 mol CH 4 km −2 d −1 in July 1992) as compared with that of this work (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lammers et al, 1995;Gaedicke et al, 1997;Obzhirov et al, 2004 Bering Sea <200 m Siliciclastic, polar, convergent margin.…”
Section: Australian Offshore Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we suggest that the decomposition of the recent primary production of organic matter supplies the methane in Storfjorden. In comparison, release of fossil methane from seepages would cause a much higher concentration like that detected in the ice-covered Sea of Okhotsk where methane is accumulated in concentrations 4300 nM under the ice (Lammers et al, 1995).…”
Section: Sediment Resuspension and Discharge Of Submarine Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water samples for methane measurements were taken immediately from the Niskin bottles and, within a few hours, the dissolved gas was extracted from the water by vacuum-ultrasonic treatment. Methane concentrations were measured with a gas chromatograph Chrompack 9003 (GC) with flame ionization detector (FID) (Lammers et al, 1995). For GC separation, we used a packed column (Porapac Q 80/100 mesh).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%