1972
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(72)90066-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations of the cerebral dural sinuses at the torcular herophili

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
12
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7,18,19,22 Browder et al assessed 131 specimens and found no two identical venous channel patterns in the TC, whereas duplication of the main SS trunk occurred in all of its three (anterior, middle, or posterior) portions. 7 In our study, the presence of a septum in at least one SS portion was found in 9 of 22 samples (40.90%), alternatively located in any portion.…”
Section: Discussion Morphological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,18,19,22 Browder et al assessed 131 specimens and found no two identical venous channel patterns in the TC, whereas duplication of the main SS trunk occurred in all of its three (anterior, middle, or posterior) portions. 7 In our study, the presence of a septum in at least one SS portion was found in 9 of 22 samples (40.90%), alternatively located in any portion.…”
Section: Discussion Morphological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the population, the right and the left TSs were proportional (58.1% of patients) [7]. Abnormal development of one of the TSs was observed in 5% of cases at autopsy with three being on the left and seven on the right, and the SSS connecting to the opposite TS which was developed [5]. Diversity was also observed in the SSS with drainage to the centre of the CS in 58.1% (18 of 31) of patients, and in 35.5% (11) drainage into the left TS [7].…”
Section: Patients)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaplan et al (1973) and Browder and Kaplan (1976) found no traces of veins in the foramen caecum of children and late embryos, but although the same sample was used in both studies, the data on the ages of their specimens are inconsistent in the two publications (see also Kaplan et al, 1972). It seems likely that their sample included some specimens of 6 to 7 months of gestation, and possibly some < 1-year-old children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%