2017
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations on the theme of musical expertise: cognitive and sensory processing in percussionists, vocalists and non‐musicians

Abstract: Comparisons of musicians and non-musicians have revealed enhanced cognitive and sensory processing in musicians, with longitudinal studies suggesting these enhancements may be due in part to experience-based plasticity. Here, we investigate the impact of primary instrument on the musician signature of expertise by assessing three groups of young adults: percussionists, vocalists, and non-musician controls. We hypothesize that primary instrument engenders selective enhancements reflecting the most salient acous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
7
47
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Percussionists outperformed the nonpercussionists on inhibitory control, t(34) = −3.336, p = .002, d = 1.137 (percussionists: M = 113.13, SD = 14.01; nonpercussionists: M = 94.45, SD = 18.54), consistent with our previous findings in an overlapping data set (Slater et al, 2017). The percussionists were also less variable in their drumming than the nonpercussionists: self-paced: t (34 Given that the drumming measures were significantly correlated with each other, these measures were combined together into a drumming variability composite score for correlational analyses (the composite was calculated as the mean value of coefficient scores across drumming conditions: selfpaced, paced, and continuation).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Percussionists outperformed the nonpercussionists on inhibitory control, t(34) = −3.336, p = .002, d = 1.137 (percussionists: M = 113.13, SD = 14.01; nonpercussionists: M = 94.45, SD = 18.54), consistent with our previous findings in an overlapping data set (Slater et al, 2017). The percussionists were also less variable in their drumming than the nonpercussionists: self-paced: t (34 Given that the drumming measures were significantly correlated with each other, these measures were combined together into a drumming variability composite score for correlational analyses (the composite was calculated as the mean value of coefficient scores across drumming conditions: selfpaced, paced, and continuation).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The specific advantage for percussionists compared with vocalists from our previous study suggests that engagement with music alone may not be sufficient (Slater et al, 2017); however, this effect could still be due to the relative emphasis on rhythmic structure versus pitch or harmonic elements in a percussionists' practice. It therefore remains unknown whether it is engagement with rhythmic structure or the specific motor activities involved in drumming that may engender these effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations