1992
DOI: 10.1626/jcs.61.419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varietal Difference of Physical Characteristics of the Culm Related to Lodging Resistance in Paddy Rice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a short rice plant does not guarantee a high degree of lodging resistance (Ookawa and Ishihara, 1992), most of the Afghan native rice cultivars with tall culm were susceptible to lodging after heading stage. Thus, breeding for reduction of the plant height is an important objective in Afghanistan.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 1.agronomical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although a short rice plant does not guarantee a high degree of lodging resistance (Ookawa and Ishihara, 1992), most of the Afghan native rice cultivars with tall culm were susceptible to lodging after heading stage. Thus, breeding for reduction of the plant height is an important objective in Afghanistan.…”
Section: Results and Discussion 1.agronomical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chugoku 117, a lodging~tolerant high ~ yielding cultivar despite its long culm (Ookawa and Ishihara, 1992), showed 16% higher grain yield than Nipponbare due to the larger sink size but the grain yield was lower than that in Takanari (Table 1). It also showed higher CGR (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lodging of straws in tall varieties, according to Japanese scientists, is due to low tensile strengths of the straw. Shorter straw-height and leaf sheath covering enable rice to tolerate heavier load and avoid lodging (Ookawa and Ishihara, 1993). The US varieties and the Interspecific progenies were similar, and had shorter plant types (table 2).…”
Section: Morphology and Phenological Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%