2015
DOI: 10.2525/ecb.53.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varietal Differences in Flowering and Plant Growth Under Night-Break Treatment with LEDs in 12 Chrysanthemum Cultivars

Abstract: Night-break (NB) treatment inhibits flowering in short-day plants and is widely used in the flower production of cut chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.). Light-emitting diode (LED) lamps have been replacing incandescent lamps owing to energy savings. Previous studies on chrysanthemum under NB treatment with LED lamps raise the possibility of varietal difference in floral differentiation ability. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of NB treatment using LED lamps with several wavelengths on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported by Korkut (1990), Hanke (1996) and Kaur (2014) in chrysanthemum plants. Ochiai et al (2015) reported that night break treatments at 630-, 660-, and a combination of 660-and 735-nm LEDs inhibited floral differentiation in all cultivars, but combination of 660-and 735-nm LEDs had the most stabile inhibitory effect on floral differentiation among chrysanthemum cultivars. The similar effect has been reported for Chrysanthemum cv.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were reported by Korkut (1990), Hanke (1996) and Kaur (2014) in chrysanthemum plants. Ochiai et al (2015) reported that night break treatments at 630-, 660-, and a combination of 660-and 735-nm LEDs inhibited floral differentiation in all cultivars, but combination of 660-and 735-nm LEDs had the most stabile inhibitory effect on floral differentiation among chrysanthemum cultivars. The similar effect has been reported for Chrysanthemum cv.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The flowering could even be promoted by subjecting the plants to dark periods of more than 12 hr or inhibited by the interruption of long-night called as night break with a short exposure to red light with continuous or intermittent low intensity light (cyclic light) using fluorescent or incandescent lamp (Cathey and Borthwick, 1964). Ochiai et al (2015) reported that night-break (NB) treatment inhibited flowering in short-day plants and was widely used in the flower production of cut chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.). The flow-ments was better than the control (24.71 cm), but was at par among them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clones were considered had taller plants that were more favorable for cut flower (Ochiai et al, 2015). In spray type, the clones no 2015-8, 2015-11 and 2015-14 had the bigger flowers and floret size that were preferable, yet had shorter plants compared to the rest tested spray type clones.…”
Section: Plant Performances Under Highland Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Night interruption (NI) during short-day (SD) seasons effectively accelerated the flowering of long-day (LD) plants that allowed for an earlier marketing or seed production and, under naturally LD conditions, delayed the flowering of SD plants (Hamamoto et al 2005;Oh et al 2013). Recent studies reported that even low-intensity NI was effective in controlling the flowering of certain plants (Kim et al 2011;Ochiai et al 2015;Park et al 2015). According to the literature, Cymbidium aloifolium L. photosynthesized during a low-intensity, 4-h NI with 3-5 μmol m −2 s −1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), an intensity slightly higher than that of moonlight, suggesting that the increased growth and accelerated flowering with NI are attributed to the increased net photosynthesis (Kim et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%