2003
DOI: 10.1080/1461669032000127642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
669
2
100

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 737 publications
(778 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
669
2
100
Order By: Relevance
“…Different analysts have different views on the notion of defamilisation (Esping-Andersen, 1999;Korpi, 2000;Lister, 1994;Leitner, 2003;McLaughlin and Glendinning, 1994). In responding to these different views, Bambra (2007) has presented two different interpretations of defamilisation.…”
Section: Defamilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Different analysts have different views on the notion of defamilisation (Esping-Andersen, 1999;Korpi, 2000;Lister, 1994;Leitner, 2003;McLaughlin and Glendinning, 1994). In responding to these different views, Bambra (2007) has presented two different interpretations of defamilisation.…”
Section: Defamilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first interpretation stresses the 'freedom of family'. For example, Leitner (2003) regards defamilisation as unburdening the family of its caring function. Esping-Andersen (1999, p. 51) defines defamilisation as the extent to which households' welfare and caring responsibilities are relaxed either via welfare provision, or via market provision.…”
Section: Defamilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations