2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs): A patent data analysis

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis paper focuses on the diversity of engine technologies for low emission vehicles (LEVs) that are developed by car manufacturers in order to substitute for the conventional internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV). Our purpose is to analyse the competition between the various technologies for LEVs as well as the innovative strategy of car manufacturers. We first propose to define and to represent these technological trajectories in order to compare their performances and to identify their st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If we want to study the innovative strategies of car manufacturers in that field, we can use patent data as an indicator of innovation and of the technological positioning of firms 10 . In [23], we study the evolution of the patents portfolios of a sample of eleven car manufacturers 11 over the period [1990][1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999][2000][2001][2002][2003][2004][2005] by counting the number of cumulated patents for each engine technology. Figure 3 shows that the dominant design, which is considered as a very mature technology, is still continuously under improvements, and in particular diesel engine vehicles (DE).…”
Section: Ii2 Gradualism Of Environmental Innovations In Levsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If we want to study the innovative strategies of car manufacturers in that field, we can use patent data as an indicator of innovation and of the technological positioning of firms 10 . In [23], we study the evolution of the patents portfolios of a sample of eleven car manufacturers 11 over the period [1990][1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999][2000][2001][2002][2003][2004][2005] by counting the number of cumulated patents for each engine technology. Figure 3 shows that the dominant design, which is considered as a very mature technology, is still continuously under improvements, and in particular diesel engine vehicles (DE).…”
Section: Ii2 Gradualism Of Environmental Innovations In Levsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can argue that it is another signal of a step by step trajectory still strongly dependent on the dominant design. 12 This trend is also characterized by strong differences among car manufacturers which exhibit different choices of technological specialisation [23]. 13 For a complete evaluation and comparison of the LEVs technologies see [24].…”
Section: Ii2 Gradualism Of Environmental Innovations In Levsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• The level of eco-innovation activities and the directions of research in certain environmental fields: international comparison of eco-patents in specific technological fields, historical evolution of eco-patents in specific fields, technological competition between environmental technologies (for example in the fields of low emission vehicles in Frenken et al (2004) and in Oltra and Saint Jean (2006) or in the field of renewable energy in Johnsotone (2005).…”
Section: Measuring Eco-innovations With Patent Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vehicle industry is currently in a state where the established gasoline/diesel fuelled internal combustion engine (ICE) is being challenged by a number of alternative fuels and powertrain technologies (Orsato and Wells, 2007;Oltra and Saint Jean, 2009;Browne et al, 2012;Calabrese, 2012). Still, many of the proposed cleaner technology alternatives remain in a prototype stage; production and sales on a commercial basis is limited and the established technology dominates the market (Orsato et al, 2012;Sierzchula et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%