2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00025-018-0883-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$$\varvec{C}^2$$ C 2 Rational Quartic/Cubic Spline Interpolant with Shape Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various convexity-preserving interpolation spline methods have been proposed, such as the piecewise rational interpolation splines developed in (Clements, 1990;Sarfraz, 2002;Abbas et al, 2014;Han, 2008;Merrien and Sablonnière, 2013;Zhu andHan, 2015a, 2015b;Zhu, 2018), the piecewise cubic interpolation splines constructed in (Costantini, 1984;Brodlie, 1991), the piecewise weighted polynomial interpolation splines given in (Kvasov, 2014a;Kvasov, 2014b), the piecewise exponential interpolation splines presented in (Heß and Schmidt, 1986) and the piecewise polynomial interpolation splines of nonuniform degree proposed in (Kaklis, 1990). A common point of these methods is that in order to preserve convexity property, it is requested sufficient data dependent constraints on the shape parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various convexity-preserving interpolation spline methods have been proposed, such as the piecewise rational interpolation splines developed in (Clements, 1990;Sarfraz, 2002;Abbas et al, 2014;Han, 2008;Merrien and Sablonnière, 2013;Zhu andHan, 2015a, 2015b;Zhu, 2018), the piecewise cubic interpolation splines constructed in (Costantini, 1984;Brodlie, 1991), the piecewise weighted polynomial interpolation splines given in (Kvasov, 2014a;Kvasov, 2014b), the piecewise exponential interpolation splines presented in (Heß and Schmidt, 1986) and the piecewise polynomial interpolation splines of nonuniform degree proposed in (Kaklis, 1990). A common point of these methods is that in order to preserve convexity property, it is requested sufficient data dependent constraints on the shape parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the resulting rational quadratic/linear interpolant is unique to the given convex data, thus users can not interactively adjust the shape of the obtained convexity-preserving interpolation curves without changing the given convex data. Recently, some improvements on this rational quadratic/linear interpolation spline have been proposed, such as the shape preserving quartic rational splines developed in (Han, 2008;Zhu andHan, 2015a, 2015b;Zhu, 2018), which include the rational quadratic/linear interpolation spline as a special or a limit case. These improved quartic rational splines have extra local shape parameters for interactively modifying the shape of spline curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%