1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.60.054315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varying shell gap and deformation inN20unstable nuclei studied by the Monte Carlo shell model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

42
422
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 452 publications
(472 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
42
422
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation is performed with the conventional shell model, where the model space has been truncated so that the neutrons are allowed to occupy up to 4p-3h configurations for positive parity and up to 5p-4h configurations for negative parity. Thus, the shell gaps adopted are the same as in the paper [44], and the calculation has been performed considering the ground state as 1/2 + , 3/2 + , and 5/2 + . Table II shows a comparison of the spectroscopic factors obtained from the present Coulomb breakup experiment, previous knockout measurements [29], and theoretical calculations using the SDPF-M interaction for the ground-state spin and parity of 35 Al as 5/2 + .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation is performed with the conventional shell model, where the model space has been truncated so that the neutrons are allowed to occupy up to 4p-3h configurations for positive parity and up to 5p-4h configurations for negative parity. Thus, the shell gaps adopted are the same as in the paper [44], and the calculation has been performed considering the ground state as 1/2 + , 3/2 + , and 5/2 + . Table II shows a comparison of the spectroscopic factors obtained from the present Coulomb breakup experiment, previous knockout measurements [29], and theoretical calculations using the SDPF-M interaction for the ground-state spin and parity of 35 Al as 5/2 + .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the situation for the d component is different and the spectroscopic factor is in agreement in two methods, considering error, with a 99% confidence limit. To understand further details, the measured spectroscopic factors have been compared with the shell model calculation using the original SDPF-M interaction [44,45]. The calculation is performed with the conventional shell model, where the model space has been truncated so that the neutrons are allowed to occupy up to 4p-3h configurations for positive parity and up to 5p-4h configurations for negative parity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, well reproducing the evolution of the energy levels. In order to see the interplay between the shell evolution and correlation, the effective single-particle energies (ESPE) [24] are also presented in Fig. 3.…”
Section: -P4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the 0 + 2 state of 16 O is regarded as an α particle weakly coupled to 12 C. According to the weak-coupling model [9], this excitation energy is given by S α ( 16 O) − S α ( 20 Ne) + 16E ph , where S α is the separation energy of an α particle, and E ph is the particle-hole interaction which is weak. As seen in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the N = Z = 20 shell gap was estimated to decrease from 7.3 to 6.0 MeV when one includes the particle-hole excitations of the lowest order (i.e., 2p-2h for 40 Ca, for instance), adopting the single-particle space consisting of the full sd shell and the lower two pf orbits [12]. This is due to the correlation energy which is smaller in 39,41 Ca than in 40 Ca, like what happens around N = Z = 8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%