2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascular imaging of atherosclerosis: Strengths and weaknesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate a coronary angiogram image, it is necessary to compare the region of narrowing with adjacent normal vessel segments. However, there may be a consequent underestimation of the degree of stenosis if the reference region is diffusely narrowed [19]. Even though invasive coronary angiography shows the advantages, such as locating luminal irregularities with high spatial resolution (~100 µm), and real-time assessment, coronary angiography is a 2D luminogram that cannot provide information about the vessel wall and plaque characteristics [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate a coronary angiogram image, it is necessary to compare the region of narrowing with adjacent normal vessel segments. However, there may be a consequent underestimation of the degree of stenosis if the reference region is diffusely narrowed [19]. Even though invasive coronary angiography shows the advantages, such as locating luminal irregularities with high spatial resolution (~100 µm), and real-time assessment, coronary angiography is a 2D luminogram that cannot provide information about the vessel wall and plaque characteristics [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to non-invasive imaging modalities, invasive imaging modalities demonstrate higher spatial and temporal resolutions, which allows for better visualization of luminal stenosis and plaque characteristics. Moreover, most of invasive imaging modalities can provide a real-time assessment of the coronary arteries, whereas non-invasive imaging modalities such as CTCA and MRI require relatively long time of imaging processing [19]. Therefore, the invasive imaging modalities are more popular for assessing the severity of CAD and guiding treatment strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While advances have been made in diagnosing CVD and distinguishing high risk from low risk plaque using imaging techniques, there is much room for improvement. [ 161–163 ] The true significance of CCs within atherosclerotic plaques or diseases and potential therapies will rely on innovative non‐invasive imaging techniques. Larger cohort studies could be attempted to allow for studies addressing factors influencing CC formation such as the impact of psychosocial and environmental factors, chronic stress, diet, ethnicity/race, or other health disparities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IVUS and OCT have been used to identify the components of the vascular wall at a higher spatial resolution, but they are invasive ( Mantella et al, 2021 ). IVUS is a catheter-based procedure used to visualize the inside of a blood vessel in real time.…”
Section: Pipeline Of Image-based Computational Biomechanical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%