1993
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.75b1.8421008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascularised fibular grafts for reconstruction of the femur

Abstract: vascularised fibular grafts. There were 18 men and two women with an average age at operation of 36.6 years (16 to 69). Ten patients had infected nonunion, three had post-traumatic nonunion or a bone defect without infection, four had a defect after tumour resection, and three had other lesions. The mean length of the fibular grafts was 18.1 cm. Postoperative circulatory disturbances needed revision surgery in five patients, including three with circulatory problems in the monitoring flap, but not at their ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Yajima et al treated 20 patients with large bone defects or established nonunion of the femur due to various causes by vascularised fibular grafts (mean length of the fibular grafts was 18.1 cm) achieving successful outcome in 19 of the patients. 7 They highlighted the need for special microsurgical techniques. More operative time, need for use of external fixator for holding alignment, weakness of the grafted fibula and difficulties with the monitoring flap of skin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Yajima et al treated 20 patients with large bone defects or established nonunion of the femur due to various causes by vascularised fibular grafts (mean length of the fibular grafts was 18.1 cm) achieving successful outcome in 19 of the patients. 7 They highlighted the need for special microsurgical techniques. More operative time, need for use of external fixator for holding alignment, weakness of the grafted fibula and difficulties with the monitoring flap of skin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the length of the nutrient vascular pedicle, it is not possible to implant it in regions with larger soft tissue coating, because it does not reach the surface. 70 For this reason, Eisenschenk et al 18 question therefore the appliance of a skin island in the femur. Furthermore, Buyukdereli et al 18,64 doubt in their article the reliability of the skin island, because it does not always guarantee that the bone graft is also vital.…”
Section: Selection Of Postoperative Monitoring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases had been published, in which a necrotic skin island had been accompanied by a sufficient blood circulation in the bone. 70,71 On the contrary, there have also been described cases of defects in the transferred bone graft still having a vital skin island. 66 One possible explanation is the excessive stretching of the vascular pedicle for example due to postoperative swelling, 70 resulting in a decreased blood flow.…”
Section: Selection Of Postoperative Monitoring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 In this report, the use of vascularized fibular transfer for reconstruction of lower limb defects after tumor resection is evaluated as regards time to union, hypertrophy, functional outcome, and complications.…”
Section: à9mentioning
confidence: 99%