2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2017.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VASESKETCH: Automatic 3D Representation of Pottery from Paper Catalog Drawings

Abstract: We describe an automated pipeline for digitization of catolog drawings of pottery types. This work is aimed at extracting a structured description of the main geometric features and a 3D representation of each class. The pipeline includes methods for understanding a 2D drawing and using it for constructing a 3D model of the pottery. These will be used to populate a reference database for classification of potsherds. Furthermore, we extend the pipeline with methods for breaking the 3D model to obtain synthetic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the 3D analysis of ceramics covers a wide landscape, the full breadth of scholarship cannot be included here, but recent studies can generally be categorized into three groups: 1) reconstruction/ identification; 2) 3D to 2D quantification; and 3) fullvessel extraction. Studies that utilize novel 3D software to reconstruct ceramic vessels from single sherds, piece together a collection of sherds into a full vessel (Banterle et al 2017;Stamatopoulos & Anagnostopoulos 2017), or seek to identify types of pottery through 3D imaging fall into the first group of recent studies, i.e., those that focus primarily on reconstruction or identification. Studies that utilize 3D mesh or cloud data as a base, but then extract 2D outline or other 2D data (such as length measurements) fall into the second group of studies (recent examples include Göttlich et al 2021 andHarush et al 2020).…”
Section: D and 3d Morphometric Analysis Of Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the 3D analysis of ceramics covers a wide landscape, the full breadth of scholarship cannot be included here, but recent studies can generally be categorized into three groups: 1) reconstruction/ identification; 2) 3D to 2D quantification; and 3) fullvessel extraction. Studies that utilize novel 3D software to reconstruct ceramic vessels from single sherds, piece together a collection of sherds into a full vessel (Banterle et al 2017;Stamatopoulos & Anagnostopoulos 2017), or seek to identify types of pottery through 3D imaging fall into the first group of recent studies, i.e., those that focus primarily on reconstruction or identification. Studies that utilize 3D mesh or cloud data as a base, but then extract 2D outline or other 2D data (such as length measurements) fall into the second group of studies (recent examples include Göttlich et al 2021 andHarush et al 2020).…”
Section: D and 3d Morphometric Analysis Of Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An automatic classification method for the digitization of pottery profile drawings is presented by Banterle et al (2017). In this work, a structured description of the main geometric features is extracted and then, a 3D representation of each class is generated based on the geometric features.…”
Section: Performed Studies From 2010 To 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancement of data collection tools, the use of machine learning systems to classify is increasing. If the data is large enough, the system can train to automatically classify new data (Banterle et al, 2017;Funkhouser et al, 2011;Toler-Franklin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Cf. (Banterle et al 2017). ) However, to avoid the associated computation overhead of 3D reconstruction, we propose a method to obtain the synthetic fracture surface (Fig 1(f)) directly from the 2D catalog sketch, and even on-the-fly during training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%