2017
DOI: 10.3906/elk-1404-545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vector control of unbalanced 3-phase IM using forward and backward components

Abstract: Abstract:In some industries, continuous operation of 3-phase induction motors (IMs) even under faults until the scheduled maintenance time is essential. Conventional control techniques such as field-oriented control (FOC) cannot be used to control faulty IMs since this will result in significant oscillations in the speed and torque. Consequently, a new control approach must be developed for improving IM performance during fault conditions. This paper presents a method for vector control of 3-phase IMs under op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the introduced control system has a simple structure in comparison to the previous works by Gaeid et al 20 and Jannati and Idris. 21 • The proposed control scheme in this paper has a better performance compared to the existing FOC models such as those proposed by Nikpayam et al, 4 Tabasian et al, 22 and Nikpayam et al 23 in terms of torque and speed ripples due to considering L ls in the FOC equations. • The introduced control system has a high accuracy like Abbasi et al 24 However, unlike Abbasi et al 24 the proposed FOC method in this paper does not include derivative terms in the vector model equations since an asymmetrical TM is used for stator voltage quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the introduced control system has a simple structure in comparison to the previous works by Gaeid et al 20 and Jannati and Idris. 21 • The proposed control scheme in this paper has a better performance compared to the existing FOC models such as those proposed by Nikpayam et al, 4 Tabasian et al, 22 and Nikpayam et al 23 in terms of torque and speed ripples due to considering L ls in the FOC equations. • The introduced control system has a high accuracy like Abbasi et al 24 However, unlike Abbasi et al 24 the proposed FOC method in this paper does not include derivative terms in the vector model equations since an asymmetrical TM is used for stator voltage quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Different control strategies for star-connected and delta-connected TPIMs under SOF were reported in previous studies. 4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In studies by Sayed-Ahmed et al, 14 Kastha and Bose, 15 and Sayed-Ahmed and Demerdash 16 different scalar control schemes were presented for TPIMs under SOF. Scalar control strategies are not considered as a suitable control system due to slow reaction to transient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods are not precise RFOC models because of the leakage inductance elimination in the RFOC equations. In [25], an indirect RFOC technique for wye‐connected TPIM drives during SOPF condition using the conventional transformation matrix has been presented. Nevertheless, this method has complex structure because of using many PI controllers and two RFOC systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that in [22–24], two different asymmetrical transformation matrices were used in the control system. The proposed strategy aimed to retain the RFOC structure even during post‐fault operation. In this case, the introduced control method in this research has a simple control structure compared to [25]. The used direct RFOC system in this research has good performance at low speed operation compared to indirect RFOC systems in [23, 25, 27, 28] due to the rotor flux estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation