2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10111686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation Indices Do Not Capture Forest Cover Variation in Upland Siberian Larch Forests

Abstract: Boreal forests are changing in response to climate, with potentially important feedbacks to regional and global climate through altered carbon cycle and albedo dynamics. These feedback processes will be affected by vegetation changes, and feedback strengths will largely rely on the spatial extent and timing of vegetation change. Satellite remote sensing is widely used to monitor vegetation dynamics, and vegetation indices (VIs) are frequently used to characterize spatial and temporal trends in vegetation produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification accuracy was acceptable, similar to investigations carried out with comparable methodology [36], and the Kappa coefficient was 90.33%, which indicates a precise classification. The behavior patterns of the VIs in the forests respond to summer rains, where the highest values were observed and that correspond to the growing season, NDVI, SAVI, MSAVI, and EVI increase appreciably during the beginning and the end of the season of growth [50]. Forests have a longer response of lag to other types of vegetation, when they face extreme weather; their own responses to stress and their adaptability make them less influenced by climatic anomalies and have a lag response to prolonged drought due to their deep root system [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The classification accuracy was acceptable, similar to investigations carried out with comparable methodology [36], and the Kappa coefficient was 90.33%, which indicates a precise classification. The behavior patterns of the VIs in the forests respond to summer rains, where the highest values were observed and that correspond to the growing season, NDVI, SAVI, MSAVI, and EVI increase appreciably during the beginning and the end of the season of growth [50]. Forests have a longer response of lag to other types of vegetation, when they face extreme weather; their own responses to stress and their adaptability make them less influenced by climatic anomalies and have a lag response to prolonged drought due to their deep root system [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…challenging (Montesano et al 2016;Loranty et al 2018). The rarity of historical aerial photographs with comparable resolution makes it unlikely that analyses similar to this one could be completed in other regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing NDVI trends reported in this study for most parts of the DRB seem counter-intuitive given, for example, the deforestation activities that have been taking place in the basin . Thus, the trend result may not necessarily represent increasing vegetation cover for the study area, which implies that the GIMMS NDVI datasets does not capture forest cover change due to the saturation problem of the sensor (Yin et al 2012;Loranty et al 2018). Moreover, the NDVI trend results show that the GIMMS NDVI dataset do not capture local vegetation trends caused by anthropogenic effects.…”
Section: Vegetation Greenness-climate Variables Nexusmentioning
confidence: 96%