“…More tools and methods are now being used to better understand the accuracy of XBT fall rates and temperature measurements. These tools include traditional side-by-side XBT and CTD comparisons (e.g., Thadathil et al, 2002;Hamon et al, 2012;Cowley et al, 2013;Cheng et al, 2018), tests in swimming pools and water tanks (e.g., Bringas and Goni, 2015), Geophysical Fluid Dynamics models (Abraham et al, 2012(Abraham et al, , 2014Gorman et al, 2014;Shepard et al, 2014), comparison with Argo and satellite altimetry data (DiNezio and , and temporal changes of biases (DiNezio and Good, 2011;Gouretski, 2012). A careful analysis of the different individual probe types is in progress (Reseghetti et al, 2018), as different probe types have different characteristics in probe design that may impact data quality.…”