2018
DOI: 10.3390/toxins11010003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venom Proteome of Spine-Bellied Sea Snake (Hydrophis curtus) from Penang, Malaysia: Toxicity Correlation, Immunoprofiling and Cross-Neutralization by Sea Snake Antivenom

Abstract: The venom proteome of Hydrophis curtus (synonym: Lapemis hardwickii) from Penang, Malaysia was investigated with nano-electrospray ionization-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-LCMS/MS) of the reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) venom fractions. Thirty distinct protein forms were identified as toxins from ten families. The three major protein families were phospholipase A2 (PLA2, 62.0% of total venom proteins), three-finger toxin (3FTX, 26.33%) and cysteine-rich secreto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
43
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the composition and abundance of H. curtus toxins identi ed in the present study apparently differed from those in previous investigations either at the mRNA or protein level [6,8,19]. For example, the toxin transcripts of the H. curtus venom gland was shown to be mainly comprised of 3-FTx, PLA 2 , CRISP, and PDGF families using Sanger sequencing, with the rst three families accounting for 55.5% of the total venom-gland transcriptome and the 3-FTx family expressed more abundantly than PLA 2 at a ratio of 4.4:1 [19].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the composition and abundance of H. curtus toxins identi ed in the present study apparently differed from those in previous investigations either at the mRNA or protein level [6,8,19]. For example, the toxin transcripts of the H. curtus venom gland was shown to be mainly comprised of 3-FTx, PLA 2 , CRISP, and PDGF families using Sanger sequencing, with the rst three families accounting for 55.5% of the total venom-gland transcriptome and the 3-FTx family expressed more abundantly than PLA 2 at a ratio of 4.4:1 [19].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…When compared with previously investigated H. curtus venoms from Australia and Malaysia [6,8], the venom from the South China Sea population evaluated in the presented study diverged signi cantly with regard to the relative abundance of predominant toxins at the protein level. The South China Sea population exhibited the lowest abundance of PLA 2 but the highest abundance of 3-FTx, especially SNX, which was approximately 4-and 1.45-fold higher than those from Australia and Malaysia, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The engineering of broad-spectrum AChBPs would ideally also use this humanized molecular backbone while taking advantage of the increased affinity (Nirthanan and Gwee, 2004) and pharmacological properties of other nAChR mimics, such as the Torpedo nAChR. Finally, while we explored the toxin capturing potential of AChBPs against a number of geographically diverse elapid snakes, such optimized broad-spectrum AChBPs would require testing against an increased breadth of venoms, including additional species within the elapid genera studied here and perhaps also members of the Hydrophiinae (marine elapids), whose venoms often contain abundant and highly potent α-neurotoxins that are typically not effectively neutralized by existing antivenoms (Tan et al, 2015; Tan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wide range of ecologies representing different potential selection pressures make snakes an ideal system on which to test the role of trophic ecology on the evolution of predator traits. Previous studies have used snakes as a group to test the role of trophic ecology in driving venom composition [31][32][33][34], potency [24,[35][36][37], and the evolutionary atrophy of venom systems [38]. However, the use of non-standardised test models which typically do not represent natural prey species have previously confounded comparative analysis of venom potency [24,[39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%