2002
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2002.578.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventilation Performances of a Large Canarian Type Greenhouse Equipped With Insect-Proof Nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These finding are similar to what have been found by other authors that the combination of roof and side openings increases air velocity hence the air renewal rate (Bartzanas et al, 2005;Fatnassi et al, 2001;Harmanto et al, 2006).…”
Section: Influence Of Ventilation Strategy On Air Renewal Ratessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These finding are similar to what have been found by other authors that the combination of roof and side openings increases air velocity hence the air renewal rate (Bartzanas et al, 2005;Fatnassi et al, 2001;Harmanto et al, 2006).…”
Section: Influence Of Ventilation Strategy On Air Renewal Ratessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since the air in both greenhouse types was the same, the difference must be solely due to roof shape and associated differences in aero-dynamics. According to earlier work, under low wind speeds where natural buoyancy dominates, a combination of roof and side vents were required to maintain an effective rate of air exchange (Kittas et al, 1997;Fatnassi et al, 2002;Kalsoulas et al, 2006). This fact was supported by the lowest temperature difference found for the greenhouse with continuous ridge vents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main drawback of this type of vents is the low degree of internal environment control due to inadequate wind-driven ventilation, particularly under less windy periods at low and mid elevations (up to 1000 m above sea level) and in farmer fields with tall vegetation (reducing the impact of winds). Covering of vents with insect screens further limits the air-flow rates (Fatnassi et al, 2002). Under warm weather, at least 30% ventilation area (with respect to floor area) should be provided for proper ventilation under hot still conditions (Hanan, 1998;Nelson, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papadakis et al (1996) found that the thermal effect was fundamental for winds of less than 1.8 m s -1 , while Boulard & Baille (1995) set this speed at 1.5 m s -1 and Sase et al (1984) at 1 m s -1 . Other researchers have suggested that in greenhouses equipped with roof vents the thermal effect can be neglected for wind speeds of over 2 m s -1 (Boulard & Baille, 1995), and this was also suggested for a greenhouse with side and roof vents (Fatnassi et al, 2002). For the latter type of greenhouse, Kittas et al (1997) found that the thermal effect is important when the ratio u o /∆T io 0.5 is less than 1, while Bot (1983) set the limit at 0.3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although many authors have obtained the coefficients C d and C w that allow the semi-empirical models to be applied (Kittas et al, 1996Papadakis et al, 1996;Boulard et al, 1997;Fatnassi et al, 2002;Teitel et al, 2008;Molina-Aiz et al, 2009, there is still considerable debate as to the exact relationship between the wind and thermal effects in the natural ventilation of greenhouses. Papadakis et al (1996) found that the thermal effect was fundamental for winds of less than 1.8 m s -1 , while Boulard & Baille (1995) set this speed at 1.5 m s -1 and Sase et al (1984) at 1 m s -1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%