1976
DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.26.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventilatory Responses to Co2 Rebreathing at Rest and During Exercise in Untrained Subjects and Athletes

Abstract: Ventilatory responses to CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The values for chemoreflex ventilation sensitivity that we measured in the current research ranged from 3.1 l min À1 mmHg À1 to 3.4 l min À1 mmHg À1 . These results are higher than those reported by other authors who have used the rebreathing method to measure chemoreflex ventilation sensitivity, for example, 1.1 l min À1 mmHg À1 in marathon runners (Miyamura 1976), 2.2 l min À1 mmHg À1 also for marathoners , 2.0 l min À1 mmHg À1 for swimmers (Heigenhauser et al 1983), and 2.4 l min À1 mmHg À1 for runners (Godfrey et al 1971). Our higher values are likely due to our tests being conducted in hypoxia (50 mmHg PO 2 ), as hypoxia has been shown to increase the slope of the ventilation-CO 2 response curve (Mohan and Duffin 1997), whereas tests in previous studies were performed in normoxia or hyperoxia (150-200 mmHg PO 2 ).…”
Section: Chemoreflex Responsecontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The values for chemoreflex ventilation sensitivity that we measured in the current research ranged from 3.1 l min À1 mmHg À1 to 3.4 l min À1 mmHg À1 . These results are higher than those reported by other authors who have used the rebreathing method to measure chemoreflex ventilation sensitivity, for example, 1.1 l min À1 mmHg À1 in marathon runners (Miyamura 1976), 2.2 l min À1 mmHg À1 also for marathoners , 2.0 l min À1 mmHg À1 for swimmers (Heigenhauser et al 1983), and 2.4 l min À1 mmHg À1 for runners (Godfrey et al 1971). Our higher values are likely due to our tests being conducted in hypoxia (50 mmHg PO 2 ), as hypoxia has been shown to increase the slope of the ventilation-CO 2 response curve (Mohan and Duffin 1997), whereas tests in previous studies were performed in normoxia or hyperoxia (150-200 mmHg PO 2 ).…”
Section: Chemoreflex Responsecontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Byrne-Quinn et al (1971) observed diminished ventilatory responses to hypercapnic and hypoxic stimuli in 13 varsity athletes. Several authors have hitherto con®rmed that hypoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory responses were signi®cantly lower in well-trained runners and swimmers (Miyamura et al 1976;Ohkuwa et al 1980;Bjurstrom and Schoene 1987). Reduced ventilatory responsiveness to hypoxia and hypercapnia is considered to be attributable to decreased chemosensitivity of chemoreceptors through physical training for long periods (Blum et al 1979) because the hypercapnic ventilatory response was decreased by physical training and increased by detraining (Miyamura and Ishida 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have reported that hypoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory responses are signi®cantly lower than normal in endurance runners and swimmers (Byrne-Quinn et al 1971;Miyamura et al 1976;Scoggin et al 1978;Ohkuwa et al 1980;Bjurstrom and Schoene 1987). This reduced ventilatory responsiveness in endurance athletes is considered to be due to decreased chemosensitivity through physical training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) in comparison with untrained subjects (1.86 and 2.03 l · min Ϫ1 · torr Ϫ1 ) [12,13]. Stanescu et al [1] observed that the mean slope (ϮSD) in the yoga group, 0.70Ϯ0.29 l · min Ϫ1 · torr Ϫ1 , was significantly (pϽ0.01) lower than in the control group (1.73Ϯ0.84 l · min Ϫ1 · torr…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%