2014
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.1920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Venturing Towards the Dark Side’: The Use of Imagery Interventions by Recently Qualified Cognitive–Behavioural Therapists

Abstract: There is a universal recognition of the value of imagery for experiential learning and emotional connection. Therapists apply a variety of rationales for using imagery. Avoidance of using imagery in CBT practice is widely reported and occurs for a variety of personal and clinical reasons. Clinicians' own experience of imagery has a significant influence on the way in which imagery is understood, utilized and experienced in therapy. Future training and research in imagery should more explicitly address the clin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A qualitative study by Bell, Mackie, and Bennett-Levy (2015) highlighted that this could be due to therapist concerns such as lack of confidence, practice, and training; concern clients and colleagues may perceive imagery interventions to be alternative fringe practices; concern that the increased affect evoked by imagery may be destabilising for clients and clinicians; and the perception that imagery interventions are unstructured and unpredictable. A qualitative study by Bell, Mackie, and Bennett-Levy (2015) highlighted that this could be due to therapist concerns such as lack of confidence, practice, and training; concern clients and colleagues may perceive imagery interventions to be alternative fringe practices; concern that the increased affect evoked by imagery may be destabilising for clients and clinicians; and the perception that imagery interventions are unstructured and unpredictable.…”
Section: Why Use Mental Imagery In Cbt? the Rationale For Imagery Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A qualitative study by Bell, Mackie, and Bennett-Levy (2015) highlighted that this could be due to therapist concerns such as lack of confidence, practice, and training; concern clients and colleagues may perceive imagery interventions to be alternative fringe practices; concern that the increased affect evoked by imagery may be destabilising for clients and clinicians; and the perception that imagery interventions are unstructured and unpredictable. A qualitative study by Bell, Mackie, and Bennett-Levy (2015) highlighted that this could be due to therapist concerns such as lack of confidence, practice, and training; concern clients and colleagues may perceive imagery interventions to be alternative fringe practices; concern that the increased affect evoked by imagery may be destabilising for clients and clinicians; and the perception that imagery interventions are unstructured and unpredictable.…”
Section: Why Use Mental Imagery In Cbt? the Rationale For Imagery Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these compelling reasons to use imagery within CBT, therapists can sometimes be hesitant to incorporate imagery routinely within their interventions. A qualitative study by Bell, Mackie, and Bennett-Levy (2015) highlighted that this could be due to therapist concerns such as lack of confidence, practice, and training; concern clients and colleagues may perceive imagery interventions to be alternative fringe practices; concern that the increased affect evoked by imagery may be destabilising for clients and clinicians; and the perception that imagery interventions are unstructured and unpredictable. Greater understanding of how imagery can be used in CBT seems fundamental to helping clinicians overcome such attitudinal and educational barriers.…”
Section: Why Use Mental Imagery In Cbt? the Rationale For Imagery Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, these processes are not rigidly separated but influence each other in many directions which can roughly be reduced to a bottom – up direction, from the sensory-motor level perceived as emotions ( bottom ) to voluntary propositional cognitive and metacognitive representations ( up ), and vice versa, that is top – down . In turn, this bi-directional reductionist model may be also useful in order to map therapeutic interventions: bottom – up interventions that aim to regulate the emotional and cognitive processes through experiential exposure, experiential re-education, guided-imagery, or role playing (Bell et al 2015 ; Hackmann et al 2011 ); and top – down interventions aiming at acting at a verbal, declarative, and re-attributional level. Top – down interventions are, however, implemented mostly at a second-order metacognitive level in which mental states are regulated by attention, but not fully controlled by rational reasoning (Wells and Mathews 1994 ; Williams et al 1988 ).…”
Section: Back To Functionalism?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process of negotiating a shared understanding of subjective, and inter‐subjective, meaning‐making matches the aims of the current project: i.e., to understand the personal experience of trainees as they engage in mental imagery of a relational nature, within the context of their role as a therapist. There is precedence of using IPA to explore CBT therapists' experience of using imagery (Bell, Mackie, & Bennett‐Levy, ) and the development of self‐compassion in clients (e.g., Pauley & McPherson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%