2006
DOI: 10.13092/lo.26.620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbalternationen und Verbspaltung im Neugriechischen

Abstract: This paper deals with a group of five alternations for the Modern Greek verb in the syntactic frame NPi__NP for the active form and NP__ for the corresponding active or passive form. The alternations causative/auto, causative/reflexive, causative/reciprocal, causative/control, and passive participle are presented. It is shown how the interpretation of some of these alternations is influenced by the context. The second part deals with the splitting of the verbs kapnízo and potízo into homophonous lexical units … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the AC marks the content of the verb base additionally, i.e. the content of the base of kapnízo1 is not simply [smoke] but [smoke] + 1*a/b_*9 (→emission/endogenous product) and the content of the base of kapnízo2 is not simply [smoke], but [smoke] + 2a/b_8a/b_9 (→covering) etc., so that the precise determination of the verb base can be achieved co-operatively (see Charitonidis , 2006. To go back to Jackendoff 's example, the corresponding ACs for the verb unit in (2) must be similarly elaborated in order to test the validity of the associated lexical rules, and esp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the AC marks the content of the verb base additionally, i.e. the content of the base of kapnízo1 is not simply [smoke] but [smoke] + 1*a/b_*9 (→emission/endogenous product) and the content of the base of kapnízo2 is not simply [smoke], but [smoke] + 2a/b_8a/b_9 (→covering) etc., so that the precise determination of the verb base can be achieved co-operatively (see Charitonidis , 2006. To go back to Jackendoff 's example, the corresponding ACs for the verb unit in (2) must be similarly elaborated in order to test the validity of the associated lexical rules, and esp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%