Soziologie Und Natur 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-11442-0_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vergesellschaftete Natur — Öffentliche Diskurse und soziale Strukturierung. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit der Cultural Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discourses can actively be changed because the constraints that discourses impose are open to challenge (Darier 1999). The strengthening of alternative discourses is especially important, since discourses shape what can and cannot be communicated and thought, delimit the range of policy options and thereby serve as precursors to policy outcomes (Keller and Poferl 1998;Litfin 1994;Hajer and Versteeg 2005). With an awareness of how a discourse is operating, it becomes possible to conceive how that discourse might be challenged, or to consider the adoption of a different discourse or the creation of a new discourse altogether.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discourses can actively be changed because the constraints that discourses impose are open to challenge (Darier 1999). The strengthening of alternative discourses is especially important, since discourses shape what can and cannot be communicated and thought, delimit the range of policy options and thereby serve as precursors to policy outcomes (Keller and Poferl 1998;Litfin 1994;Hajer and Versteeg 2005). With an awareness of how a discourse is operating, it becomes possible to conceive how that discourse might be challenged, or to consider the adoption of a different discourse or the creation of a new discourse altogether.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hajer and Versteeg 2005). Discourses are meaningful stories that shape the way in which societies perceive their environment (Keller and Poferl 1998;Litfin 1994) and are assumed to play a central role in how individuals process information, communicate and reason (Jones et al 2014). Any interpretation of a phenomenon must be embedded in this repertoire of social collective discourses, which limits the ability of actors to make meaning of proposed actions and thus limits the space of what is feasible (Hermwille 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By post-positivist or post-structuralist approaches, language itself becomes problematized and seen as a performative medium that does not just describe but also constitute the world it refers to. By approaching language as discourse I refer to language and its potential power to structure, highlight and silence specific elements, next to its potential to discipline what can and cannot be thought and serve as precursors to particular outcomes (Keller and Poferl, 1998;Litfin, 1994). Discourse can be articulated within 'all kinds of spoken and written interaction, formal and informal' (Potter and Wheterell, 1987: 7).…”
Section: Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%